this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
125 points (96.3% liked)

World News

41341 readers
3639 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kyiv has agreed terms with Washington on a minerals deal that Ukrainian officials hope will improve relations with the Trump administration and pave the way for a long-term US security commitment.

Ukrainian officials say Kyiv is now ready to sign the agreement on jointly developing its mineral resources, including oil and gas, after the US dropped demands for a right to $500bn in potential revenue from exploiting the resources.

The officials argued that they had negotiated far more favourable terms and depicted the deal as a way of broadening the relationship with the US to shore up Ukraine’s prospects after three years of war.

MBFC
Archive

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

FFS. So the US successfully extorted Ukraine. World leaders need to stop fucking doing business with trump. Shit like this just makes him worse.

And the idea that this will keep the US in their corner is beyond stupid. He'll be demanding more within a month. Fuck trump and fuck America.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 96 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They should know better than to trust Trump to hold up his end of a deal.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If Trump renegs the US gets nothing. This is awful but the real politik is probably that this is the best solution Ukraine can access that stops the violence.

And it's possible Zelensky is planning to reneg on the deal as soon as Trump is out if America can accomplish that.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Zelensky should absolutely reneg. In his shoes, I'd sign about anything, but I'd also be willing to tell the US to fuck off in the end.

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 72 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it's a trap, never trust trump, a trump never pay his debt, he's a crook

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You spelled United States wrong

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

The US has the special ability to blame all bad things on their current president and definitely not the country as a whole.

Contrary to every other country in the world.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago

Now they dont have nukes OR minerals

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ukrainian officials say Kyiv is now ready to sign the agreement on jointly developing its mineral resources, including oil and gas, after the US dropped demands for a right to $500bn in potential revenue from exploiting the resources.

... then what, exactly, remains in the deal?

Ukrainian officials added that the deal was just a “framework agreement” and that no revenues would change hands until the fund was in place, allowing them time to iron out any potential disagreements. Among the outstanding issues is to agree the jurisdiction of the agreement.

I can't help but still feel this is a bad idea.

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 68 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I can't help but still feel this is a bad idea.

Totally. But Ukraine's in an impossible situation. The US running a protection racket is fucking disgusting.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

A protection racket involves actual protection though, the USA has specifically said no security agreements will be made.

I'm not sure wtf Ukraine is giving them rights for.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It is disgusting, but I also don't see what Ukraine gets out of this. It's not a protection racket if protection isn't provided in exchange. I don't know that I would even rightly call it extortion, since I don't think Ukraine signing this will affect Trump's behavior as a Putinist puppet.

I hope the stress and necessity of looking after his own country during wartime, not to mention dozens of other national leaders, hasn't led Zelensky or his team to underestimate just how ghoulish and empty Trump is, or how fucked US politics are at the moment, if they're hoping for a "Come to Jesus" moment from the GOP or judiciary if Trump blatantly turns against Ukraine.

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure they know exactly who and what Trump is. I don't think it'll change Trump's behaviour either. I'm assuming they're just gambling against the odds that it will because the near future without the US is much harder for Ukraine than it is with them.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I hope that they're stalling, or that the agreement is just something that looks good to Trump's shit-clogged brain without promising anything substantial. Or something with a subtle poison pill or loophole in it of some sort that would make 'calling in' the benefits difficult, at least for so long as the war goes on.

But I'm inclined to agree that this seems like they're just gambling that any chance of US help is better than none.

Still. I really hope it isn't.

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Well, my heart goes out to the Ukrainian people, but obviously they don't need Trump invading as well. Would he follow through? All I can say is I'm not convinced he wouldn't.

So ashamed of my country these days...

[–] wax@feddit.nu 34 points 2 days ago
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Is FT seriously trying to spin this as if Ukraine achieved anything in negotiations? American extortion won.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago

Good luck. You're gonna need it.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Uh huh. So now that we're not being terribly-exploited by Ukraine any more and Trump can announce that he has brilliantly cut a deal which will, no doubt, make America great again, are we ramping supply of military hardware back up?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To "peacekeeping forces" under the command of Russia, to secure the minerals, of course. /s

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

its easier to build mining infrastructure and then let russians take it over again

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is there any info on what Ukraine gains from this, other than "improved relations"?

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

Doesn't seem like there's anything in writing.

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably a share of any developed resources. And defence today. Probably not enough to consider this deal, I hope it is time limited

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

No defense agreement at all as far as I can tell. Just some ambiguous insinuation that trump and Russia will make a better deal because of it.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Ukraine should know better than to appease dictators

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago

Ukraine should offer to investigate the Bidens for return of Crimea.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago
[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if Ukraine is calling Trump's bluff.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Trump doesn't have to bluff anything. I've seen a few comments now suggesting that Zelenskyy somehow has the upper hand and is negotiating from a position of strength while Trump is weak.

Ukraine and Zelenskyy have absolutely no leverage over Trump. Zip, notta.

I hope Ukraine wins this war. I hope Putin pisses off Trump and Trump resumes full support for Ukraine. I hope Putin is destabilized and better leadership replaces him.

But Zelenskyy is no position to "call" anything and Trump has no reason to bluff.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, hate to be like this, but I have a small correction for you. “Notta” isn’t a word. The word you’re looking for is “nada”, which is “nothing” in Spanish.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Welcome to the world of evolving languages! There's notta problem here.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But Zelenskyy is no position to “call” anything and Trump has no reason to bluff.

I don't think this is a 'bluff' or being 'called', but I do feel the need to point out that this is a similar situation to the tariffs on Canada and Mexico - Trump seeks a 'win' by looking 'tough'. Insofar as he can be made to seem weak or foolish, such deals are a loss for him. Zelensky is, arguably, in a position to 'call' simply because Trump seems very likely to rescind aid and take Russia's side regardless of what Zelensky does.

But again - I don't think this is a bluff or a call. And not knowing the details of the agreement makes it even hazier.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Gotcha. I see better where you're coming from now. Yeah, Zelenskyy needs to be very very careful.

edit: mixed up commenters but the comment above is insightful and turn out right.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I'd love if they went "well, the deal was for these resources in Crimea, and since they're not under our border any more, we can't deliver!"

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

If it's a fair deal for Ukraine and Trump sticks to it, who knows maybe this will turn out for the better. Yeah I'm skeptical but I want to see peace in Ukraine.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Jesus. That man has aged ten years for every year of the war effort

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

So they gave up their minerals and will continue to be invaded. Great deal!

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

“If you give a mouse a cookie…”