a= "birds are dinos"
b= "dinos are reptiles"
c= "birds are reptiles"
Structure: If a then b, therefore c
a does not imply b without an additional statement (which we can assume from the rest would be "because birds are reptiles")
You've basically just said birds are reptiles because birds are reptiles
I think they were pointing out the structural issue with your statement. They info you are attempting to convey is correct. Your ability to do so is questionable.
A wealthy man from Soth Africa has weird views on eugenics? I'm shocked!
So I took a browse through your comment history out of idle curiosity. You're an "um actually" concern troll that just looks for things to argue about. It's pretty obvious you don't actually care. Maybe you shouldn't feel satisfaction with being a contrarian assbag for entertainment.
Are you sure that wasn't just an attempted joke about the phrase asexual reproduction?
Now it's a Z:\bra
I'm pretty sure cow is the species common name and bull/heffer are the sex variant terms.
You know, like how a rooster and a hen are both still chickens?
Yeah, the color is nice but the cut is atrocious.
The quality of the writing is questionable and the humor is juvenile, but there's an okay story in there. I think it comes down to if you care for death games as a setting.
Is a Romano as unpleasant as it looks? I'm having a hard time understanding the appeal.
Do the French dislike honey?
I've long since blocked HexBear , but will occasionally click the "show me anyway" button just to validate that decision. I'm somehow still surprised by the advanced stage brainrot every time.