Well, this is a solid admission that they are going to use deep fakes to influence elections.
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
929 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
69346 readers
2990 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Are least it's evidence that worry they might need to need to influence anther election.
Silver lining...?
Noo we just demand this specific instance of deregulation because... uh, it theoretically might help small businesses!
Also why would you even care about anything other than short-term GDP increase. Are you some kind of communist?!?
Minnesota scraps that law and uses Elon's deepfakes to claim he wants to destroy Medicare
Elon calls for laws banning deepfakes
can elon and linda hurry up and die already
Rich people live a lot longer than us.
So is their position that deception via impersonation is free speech?
Who can make a deep fake of der Elon professing his love for trans people? Wherein he states that he was wrong about the woke mind virus. That he wishes he had been born to a black family.
"what do you mean we can't use fake misleading videos to fuck democracy?"
"The rules were you guys weren't gonna fact check."
How isn't this immediately a red flag?
There are so many flags right now it’s just a sea of red undulations. Done by design, so that we don’t notice the death of democracy.
They overwhelm everyone knowing that 80% of this shit is gonna get outlawed or overturned, but that 20% that gets through is gonna be huge for them.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Something only a childish brat would even think to try
Can we join forces and spam X with a flood of Informative deep fakes of select individuals?
You could, but it would just be limited reach. There is no way to fight back using his own platform beyond just not going there.
Something that has been bothering me lately. Reasonable people who counter the toxic misinformation leaving the platform only allows the disease to grow and spread. But reality is they weren't reaching the people that needed the dose of reality anyway. And then I realized that the algorithms have always been the disease, my feeds are my own echo chamber to drive engagement, just as theirs are. I've pretty much cut all social networks out. The only way to change minds is honest respectable conversation, and I am not a person to change anyone's mind.
We're fucked
Link me some and I'll have fun with it.
This is what the right is doing, while the DNC is censuring their own members for simply encouraging democrats to run against their own apathetic incumbents.
You misspelled pathetic.
My state will see you in court.
Why would they want to "influence elections"?
Sounds shady.
It's a huge part of the business model. Social Media is valuable for its data on people, and for its ability to manipulate and influence people.
"The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact-check."
Delivering that line with such glee like he thought he had some sort of high ground.
Makes me sick.
"You guys aren't gonna use AI for bad stuff, right?"
Tech oligarchs: whaaaaaat no we actually want to be regulated because of how dangerous this technology is!! Also tech oligarchs:
Remember when this stuff was called "the quiet part', and it was considered bad when you said it out loud?
Yeah...good times.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Cool. Let's go with criminal impersonation, defamation, and slander/libel instead them!
What a fucking chode.
If you need it to be legal to deepfake to manipulate politics you’re the problem.
X’s lawsuit claims the law’s “requirements are so vague and unintelligible that social media platforms cannot understand what the statute permits and what it prohibits.”
The issue with this argument is that social media platforms aren't required to enforce it? https://www.sos.mn.gov/media/5626/deep-fake-overview.pdf
load more comments
(3 replies)
X’s lawsuit claims the law’s “requirements are so vague and unintelligible that social media platforms cannot understand what the statute permits and what it prohibits.”
Vague, overly broad laws are indeed a problem; I’m willing to give him that. ONLY that.
Unfortunately for Musk, this is not vague. If the footage is something you created or manipulated, you know perfectly damn well whether it’s legal or not. He’s trying to confuse the issue, and conflate fraud with free speech. Hopefully, the court will see right through him.
load more comments
(2 replies)
And the Fake News crowd goes wild! By the way, that's conservatives and all of their media.
Elon Musk, Republican President who is literally BANKROLLING THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY, SUING because he can't Create Fake News with AI, is PROOF that DEMOCRATS are the Fake News!
load more comments
(1 replies)
Next up: Elmo challenges laws that prohibit murder and child pornography, all in the name of a better world!
He had that fetish roleplay account where he pretended to be his toddler…
The dude is convinced he can "win" by out-procreating everyone else, it's obvious he has some very serious mental issues that need addressing but he'll never actually do the work required to be better. He's exactly like the Quiverfull people trying to out-populate their perceived enemies, assuming their descendents will follow their same credo.
“How will we win if we can’t cheat?”
view more: next ›