this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
664 points (97.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21254 readers
1494 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] Gyroplast@pawb.social 160 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    "Cash or credit?" "Arch, btw."

    [–] ritchie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

    Sir, this is a wendy's.

    [–] jiberish@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    neofetch is deprecated. There are several alternatives like fastfetch.

    [–] timestatic@feddit.org 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    For those who got used to type neofetch they probably just put an alias in for fastfetch

    [–] Zozano@lemy.lol 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    Wait, people type neofetch, as opposed to setting it to run with each time the shell is loaded?

    [–] vinyl@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    That shit is so annoying especially when I am just using a small window size.

    [–] numanair@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

    Yeah, and besides I need to see the latest ad for esm support.

    [–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    I wonder what distro they use

    [–] iii@mander.xyz 80 points 1 week ago

    Color suggests mint

    [–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 48 points 1 week ago

    Papara Linux

    [–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 34 points 1 week ago

    neofetch maybe?

    [–] FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 73 points 1 week ago (1 children)
    [–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 80 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

    As entertaining as that is, it does raise the question - why do they put all of the details on the back now?

    I thought one of the main reasons that the CVV was on the signature strip was so if a card was photocopied, photographed, or carbon copied (literally on carbon paper), then it was still less possible to clone the card.

    Is "physical" cloning so small of a problem now that it's more beneficial to make fancy looking cards? Anyone in the industry able to shine a light?

    [–] noredcandy@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    This is an EMVCo chip card, and not an American one so it’s chip and pin most likely. Without getting too detailed, the chip generates a one time use code for each transaction, so just having the number wouldn’t help with cloning the card plus you also would need to know the PIN. Although skimmers still exist and physical card theft is a thing, it’s less common especially in markets that use chip and pin.

    [–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Absolutely spot on, thank you - always handy to know.

    I'm wondering what it does to mitigate the "card not present" fraud though, for online purchases or remote purchases?

    [–] iii@mander.xyz 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    In my case, I have to verify online purchases on my bank's app. Which makes online banking impossible without an android or apple phone.

    [–] Doxin@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    As far as I understand it the pin&chip system involves a challenge/response between the bank and the card. You can't just "clone" the chip, because the secret data it contains is essentially write-only.

    [–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear.

    I'm assuming the 16 digit card number, start and expiry dates, and CVV are printed on the reverse - whereas it used to only have the CVV on the reverse and the rest of the details on the front.

    What's stopping someone with a picture of the rear of the card visiting an online retailer and going wild with a picture of just one side of the card these days - aside from multi-factor authentication at the point of authorising the payment?

    [–] Doxin@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago

    Oh! In that case: absolutely nothing. Credit cards are terrifyingly insecure. Whether or not the info is on two sides or one. Any webshop you use your credit card at can just arbitrarily charge it from then on if they feel like it.

    The CVV should really be 2FA from your card issuer.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] noredcandy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

    There’s additional tools for e-commerce transactions like 3DSecure (step up authentication like an OTP) and passive identity verification tools.

    [–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    I just replied this to the parent comment.

    Furthermore even if a card is skimmed these days, at least in the UK, it’s still unlikely transactions would be processed online.

    That’s because it’s become so commonplace now for transactions to pop-up in the banks app on the owners phone and they must confirm the transaction and / or receive a code via SMS. Some just use SMS as a means to confirm a transaction.

    I guess one vector for attack still remains and that is SIM swapping, but even that is more difficult these days due to widespread awareness from carriers.

    [–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

    Furthermore even if a card is skimmed these days, at least in the UK, it’s still unlikely transactions would be processed online.

    That’s because it’s become so commonplace now for transactions to pop-up in the banks app on the owners phone and they must confirm the transaction and / or receive a code via SMS. Some just use SMS as a means to confirm a transaction.

    I guess one vector for attack still remains and that is SIM swapping, but even that is more difficult these days due to widespread awareness from carriers.

    [–] r00ty@kbin.life 2 points 1 week ago

    I mean, if they knew where you usually shop online, probably not. I generally get the popup when either:

    1: Shopping somewhere for the first time
    2: Certain businesses (presumably those that are more often targeted for fraud I guess?)

    I bet if they tried to use a different delivery address (and the shop passed that on) it should (I think at least) trigger a security check.

    In shops especially with contactless it's very unlikely to be stopped though. But I think the bank needs to eat the contactless losses if I remember right. I do recall there's a maximum number of contactless payments you can make in a given time before it forces chip and pin though.

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago

    It’s literally because vain idiots kept posting pictures of their credit card online and getting defrauded.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] Vash63@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    Does this get you a discount on Arch Premium?

    [–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 week ago

    It’s how I got my office an amazing deal on Arch Enterprise

    [–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

    Never leave the home directory without it!

    [–] velvetThunder@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
    [–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

    Ah, thanks.

    [–] blibla@slrpnk.net 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)
    [–] hexabs@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago
    [–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

    "Hey, wanna check out my credit card?"

    [–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    This is what happens when you think manually partitioning disks and chrooting makes you leet.

    [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

    No fun allowed!

    [–] freewheel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

    Funny thing is, I did neither of those things the last time I had need to install; the script handled it for me.

    [–] toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

    Not so glum, chum

    [–] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    When I made a new linux install I chose Arch. I think for me the reasoning is thus. While I have a LOT of experience with unborking server linux installs, with desktop it's just a pain to deal with. I previously used Manjaro which, while very easy to install, does obfuscate a lot of what happens behind the scenes. When it goes wrong, personally I found it harder to fix.

    With Arch, beyond enough to give me a terminal and basic gnu tools, I've chosen what I install from then on. I think that means when things go wrong there's a much higher chance I'll know what it is and how to solve it.

    Time will tell if this plan works out or not though :P

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

    ASCII art is the best art

    [–] atheridis@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

    Wondering if on the receipt it’ll say you’re running Java.

    [–] grandpacore@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

    This is really lame lol.

    load more comments
    view more: next ›