this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
362 points (97.9% liked)

> Greentext

7549 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LudwigvanBeethoven@sh.itjust.works 85 points 3 months ago

Actually rational take?? Holy hell

[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 72 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Is the youtuber Investor Linus (tech tips)? If so, what are his controversial politics?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 82 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Calling adblockers piracy is one i remember

[–] grue@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago (2 children)

He also said that he would consider Linus Media Group unionizing a "personal failure," which is about as good as you could typically expect from a business owner but still not great.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 83 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Giving him the benefit of the doubt, he probably meant that if a business owner treats his employees well, there shouldnt be a need to unionize. But that would mean he fundamentally misunderstands what a union is and why you want one. I dont know which is worse.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago

Your benefit of the doubt assumption is correct. He has explained it in detail a couple of times. Like you I find it unfortunate and frustrating.

Still, based on some of the numbers they have talked about their employee retention is very good and considering how talented many of the people who work for him are, if it were a shitty place to work that could likely easily find work elsewhere. I have a number of criticisms of Linus and his ADHD snap judgments or out of touch privileged takes, but he still strikes me as someone that does genuinely want to do the right thing that got insanely lucky and had to adapt to a crazy situation no random person off thee street would ever be that prepared before.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

His POV on that from what I could tell was that he didn't want a union to be necessary. He wasn't opposed to the benefits one would provide, he just wanted to have a workplace where people didn't need to unionize just to get those benefits.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 28 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Although he admits to using one. Still a stupid take but he's not like, adamantly anti-adblocker.

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 46 points 3 months ago

Broke: adblockers are like piracy, which is bad.

Woke: adblockers are like piracy, which is based.

[–] Dumbkid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He also admits to pirating games and media. So like I think I agree, adblockers are a way to access things without "paying". Think people thought he was saying piracy like it was a bad thing. But I think he was just being literal.

[–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago

In essence what he said was "know what you're doing" from what I can tell. No major judgement of the behavior, but instead just a notice that one should be aware of their actions. Personally I'd love if more sites just added a ko-fi link or similar. You made good stuff? Here's some money I can spare, and if I get even more use out of your content in the future, I'll pay you a little more then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I don't support ltt but that's the weakest (most cope least knowledgeable) argument there is honestly

like that makes sense because by adblocking you are basically receiving "paid" content for "free" (i put quotes bc the site isn't getting paid unless you click but whatever)

he elaborates to say that he isn't criticising it, just drawing an analogue, and that he uses one himself iirc

ublock origin+sponsorblock <3 btw

btw my reason for not liking ltt is just that i don't like the consolidation of media and info sources, and that there's just higher quality content to watch

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They also started to favor quantity of content over quality.

While true before a year ago, at the same time the SMM thing happened, they did some content mistakes, owned up to them and started doing the exact opposite of what you're saying

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] piranhaphish@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This was me, basically.

I had a Thinkpad X1 Carbon Gen 10 that, by the books, should have been a beast with good Linux support to boot. I tried for so long, but ended up replacing it with a Framework.

The thermal management on the Thinkpad is awful, under Linux at least but by all accounts attributable to the EC itself. Running the most basic workload would cause the CPU to spike for about one second before it would throttle all cores back to 400 MHz where they would stay locked for the next few minutes despite the CPU temps remaining at 50-60°C the entire time.

And it wasn't just me, numerous reports from all over. This made the system nearly useless. I shared pages of diagnostic info with them and they just seemed completely uninterested in trying to do anything about it.

Spec'd out equivalently, the Framework 16 (without GPU) is no more expensive than the X1 Carbon but with even better Linux support and unsurpassable upgradeability. I'm glad my company was onboard for me to switch.

[–] foofiepie@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (17 children)

Ok fuck it.

Tell me why i shouldn’t go for this as my next daily driver after one MBP after another for over 15 yrs. I’m serious.

[–] Bread@sh.itjust.works 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You shouldn't buy a framework because you will be robbing yourself of the joy of a brand new laptop every 3 to 5 years because the battery is not replaceable or the WiFi chip went bad and it is soldered in. Think of all the innovations you will be missing out on because you are just swapping parts out like some kind of animal.

Do you think this is some kind of investment or something? Computers are just disposable things that everyone can afford. Why bother fixing things? I just have my butler go grab me a new one whenever I accidentally drop it in the pool while browsing on my floating inflatable chair.

[–] itsmect@monero.town 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

lol. Look at the current state and trend of tech and tell me with a straight face that it's you who will be getting the innovation. What amazing feature was introduced in the last 10 years you couldn't live without? How much garbage was introduced just because companies could get away with it because the average consumers PC is powerful enough to not notice the spyware/adware/bloatware running in the background?

Yes, buy the new thing. Consume. Trash. Buy new.

I don't even value repairability to save a buck long term. I value it because I know I can get my system up and running again ways before I finish setup on a new device.

[–] Bread@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There have been a ton of innovative hardware and software features. Such as ADs in the start menu, firmware locked parts to the system, always on facial recognition cameras, soldered on ssd storage, windows recall, AI processors, planned obsolescence.

So much innovation in such little time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] itsmect@monero.town 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You are doing it wrong. Framework is easy to DIY, use that option and bring your own memory and storage. Only get what you need right now, you can always upgrade later when prices come down. Instead of the included charger, get a high quality third party 65W GAN charger. All that gets the cost down to about 1600 with barely any downside. Don't buy a modular device without using the modularity to your advantage.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

This is exactly what I did. I love my framework.

Will it be a legend like Thinkpad in 10years? Probably not. Is it better than 99.99% of unrepairable essentially disposable laptops ? Fucking yes it is.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I think you might need more storage.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wow thats a both pricey and monstrous specs (IDK about the proc but seems like a beast too!).

What's the 3 x 1TB cards? SSDs ??

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Mikina@programming.dev 31 points 3 months ago (6 children)

This is the first time I'm hearing about Framework. Is it worth it? I'm looking for a new laptop anyway

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 60 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I guess it depends what you value. I have a Framework 13, first generation. I run Linux on it and really enjoyed putting it together myself (I ordered the DIY option).

I absolutely love their ports. You swap in the ports you want. I normally run a USB C on either side (so I can charge from either side) plus a USB A on each side (the Framework 13 has two slots each side, I think the 16 might have 3 each side?). But I also have HDMI, Display Port, and micro SD in case I need them. I can hot swap them in.

Their guides are awesome. I broke a screen and was able to order another and replace it myself following their guide. When the time comes (probably in the next year or so) I'm planning on upgrading. A bit like a desktop, since it's been a few years it means replacing the motherboard (what they call the mainboard) and RAM since technology moves on. I"m pretty sure like all laptops the CPU is fixed to the mainboard, but you can upgrade RAM or storage without replacing the whole guts (assuming same slot type). In fact you can buy without some pieces and reuse stuff you have or buy from elsewhere to save some money.

When I eventually do it I'm planning on strapping the old mainboard to the back of my TV as a HTPC (replacing the old dying laptop currently there).

There are plenty of downsides. No touchscreen. I wish the screen was a little brighter, it's not bad but could be better (might be better with later models?). I replaced the hinges with their more resistant ones but the screen still moves if I carry it around with the screen open (not sure if it's still an issue on newer models).

I really value the idea of repairability and upgradeability. When I was younger you could swap a bigger harddrive or RAM into a laptop if you had a screwdriver (and sometimes even without), and repairing other parts was also possible. These days you're more likely to find the whole thing glued together. Framework lets you do your own repairs, and has guides to walk you through every step.

There are probably more downsides, but I do love it and would buy another in a heartbeat. But if there are special things you need then carefully check. For example last I checked they did not have a full size SD card reader module available (though of course you can use a regular external one if you really need to).

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The biggest one that I’m glad to never have to worry about:

User replaceable battery

You can even put a bigger battery in down the line if you wish. No planned obsolescence.

[–] cor315@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, all the dell business laptops I've purchased have a replaceable battery. You just have to unscrew the bottom panel to do it. But no, they don't have a swappable battery.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Best laptop I've had so far, but they're quite expensive for their performance tier. The expectation is that you'd never replace it, so theoretically the cost pays itself off over time, but that would assume that you are able and willing to do that sort of long term maintenance.

Basically, I would only recommend it if you were a tinkerer.

[–] piranhaphish@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I disagree on the comment about cost disparity. Spec'd equivalently, even the Framework 16 (without GPU) is no more expensive than the smaller ThinkPad X1 Carbon. The more comparative Framework 13 even less so.

The modular ports (and GPU on the 16) are a nice bonus, but I agree that the largest attraction is for the tinkerer.

I think the fact that it is easily upgradable makes it a clear winner on the merits alone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago

If you've got the cash to spare, they just about kick the shit out of absolutely everything on the market, and are consumer repairable to boot.

[–] egonallanon@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

I like mine a lot but as the other commenter alluded too they're pretty pricey but for the 13inch one I think it's the best laptop on the market at that size at the moment.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I love it, it's amazing.

I do have the first generation which has a battery drain issue, which has since been fixed.

I always use my hardware for a looong time, but I look forward to only having to replace the main mobo and not the screen or keyboard when I do need an upgrade.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vuraniute@thelemmy.club 8 points 3 months ago

framework 13 snapdragon x edition when

load more comments
view more: next ›