this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
157 points (92.0% liked)

Technology

62853 readers
4147 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I understand the "but I like TikTok" crowd, but China bans US companies from operating in China all the time. Why is it all of a sudden a problem when we do it to them?

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Facebook had less than a million users in China before it was banned in 2009. It was struggling against domestic platforms like Webo.

TikTok has 150 million active monthly users and is one of the largest social media apps in the US.

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Number of users is not a valid argument on this type of debate

[–] Letme@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The fact that a counter-intelligence campaign has so many users is exactly why it needs to be banned

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where's the evidence that it's "counter intelligence" I hear a lot of completely unverified claims that sound like 1950s reds under the bed nationalist hysteria

[–] Letme@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Misinformation is counter-intelligence, lots of evidence out there, search "TikTok misinformation"

[–] Letme@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, I meant disinformation : Disinformation is a form of offensive counterintelligence via deception and neutralization in order to strategically manipulate an audience or create further fractures in existing divisions. Disinformation strategies include leaking, lying, seeding, and smearing.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

TikTok doesn't have any worse misinformation and disinformation issues than YouTube and Facebook. And The latest policy changes in Facebook indicate they're going to go squarely into misinformation without any fact checking.

Disinformation is an excuse to ban the platform. Zuckerberg has been lobbying Congress for a long time to ban them while pushing his platform to be able to do exactly what he claims they're doing.

There's a lot of reasons to hate TikTok, but this disinformation stuff is nothing but red herring to get them banned because they're competition.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

A. Counter-Intelligence is when you are countering intelligence gathering activities.

B. Nobody has released any evidence that TikTok is an intelligence gathering tool.

C. This law is unconstitutional by the plain text of the Constitution. SCOTUS has truly gone over the edge.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

I think tiktok should probably be banned, but I think that "it's ok because the chinese government does it" is a pretty flimsy argument.

[–] cashsky@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So is the argument now we should act like China? Thought this was America, land of freedom of speech or whatever.

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

So is the argument now we should act like China?

Unironically, I think most people who are going to Red Note might think so.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It makes a lot of sense from the perspective of the US, but a lot of countries will likely have the same debate about not only TikTok, but american social media sites and their influence on their democracies now. Especially giving the timing. Not only is Xitter known to shrug off EU regulations in actively pushing disinformation campaigns but apparently Facebook and Google are joining in too now. All the while there’s a war happening in Europe right now. The EU could make the wise decision to make the same demands to those companies that the US made towards TikTok. For our own safety.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would appreciate that, as person living in EU

[–] gaael@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The EU could make the wise decision to make the same demands to those companies that the US made towards TikTok. For our own safety.

I mean, they absolutely should.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 month ago

Sad how we're seeing people eager to ban software they don't use.

It's the same mentality for those who are cool with banning nicotine but not marijuana. "I don't like it, so neither should anyone else!"

Unfortunately, I don't hold you all above these accusations because I've routinely seen how immoral and selfish the masses are.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Russia and China are waging a war against the west, and we are standing with our pants down, pretending that everything is fine.

TikTok is a drop in the bucket, but we need to stand up and fight back against those who consider us their enemy.

No need to start shooting, but we should at least give Chinese corporations the same obstacles that they give US&EU ones if they want to do business in China:

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Trade war*

Tiktok got banned because useful idiots perpetuated FUD that only exists to make rich Americans richer. Let me say this again for those in the back: Tiktok was only banned because the American ruling class wanted the whole pie. If you ever said or believed "national security" or "privacy" concerns without evidence, I'm sorry. You fell for propaganda.

Anyone who doesn't understand this shouldn't be taken seriously.

"It's easier to fool a man than to convince him he'd been fooled." - Mark Twain

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Anyone who doesn’t understand this shouldn’t be taken seriously.

Idk about that, but the rest sounds highly probable.

I think it's both. China does benefit from Americans' attention and The Zuck & Co. are all jumping on the wagon to push out their competitor by raising their hypocritical fingers.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because the US is supposed to be better than China.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everything. 'Murican exceptionalism, baby. Fuck yeah!

[–] thirteene@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I think he does a good job at explaining both sides and calling for a root-cause solution, but he's definitely leaving out an important piece: the data collected by all the US social media companies can't just be taken by the US government. They need reasonable causes and go through channels where their access should be checked before they can get their hands on the data. The Chinese government, on the other hand, can just compel TikTok to hand over the data they want.

I don't like the data overreach by all big us tech companies, but at least their data has some safety rails around its usage.