this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
1048 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

11148 readers
2091 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TOModera@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Probably humans, given they went from 100k to 5.6k in population in 100 years and are still in decline.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's not long enough to evolve something like this, though.

[–] TOModera@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Very good point, I didn't mean to conflate it happened in the last 100 years, more so the data of their deaths that I had access to had that timeliness.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Even arrows or spears wouldn’t have been long enough to develop such a trait. And with those tools, still I don’t think Tiger would have been a primary target for humans. Seems like for most societies felines and canines were just not things we eat. Though maybe hunted for the pelt? In which case maybe they do eat the meat?

[–] Damage@feddit.it 7 points 2 weeks ago

Also statistically (since we're talking evolution) it wouldn't help much against humans, we've got good vision and intellect, the chances to fool us enough times for this adaptation to arise are slim.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Considering evolutionary time scales, this trait may have been a response to something large and dangerous that’s extinct now.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Eating a tiger liver would probably kill you with Vitamin A poisoning, a particularly painful affliction.

Easy to just avoid eating entirely, even if the rest of it is safe enough.

[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TOModera@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] swab148@lemm.ee 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't know this was something I needed. Stolen!

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

i mean i'll concede that it's not entirely ineffective, but i very much question that it would significantly affect their survival.

If a human sees a tiger which they know may well kill another human, they're not going to give a toss about where the tiger is looking, they're going to have 5 friends with them who all carry the best weapons they have available to turn that tiger into a rug.