vasametropolis

joined 1 year ago
[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Canada - Vector

[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You can’t

You can - the software would have to hook into a background check service. This can absolutely be done.

[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Profitable for who? The one hosting it foots the bill. If it was federated, all drivers could host their own instance like WordPress and a single app would connect to all instances and all drivers.

Agencies could start up to manage the tech for a negotiable fee if the drivers in the area didn't want to bother with the tech.

Whether or not it could be profitable entirely depends on the hosting and delivery model. One guy could host the tech stack and charge maintenance fees and be in the green.

If you mean rich, then yeah, nobody would probably be rich. But you can build a small business as a hosting provider no problem, and the drivers would probably get a better deal. Uber employs so many people it requires they charge money. There's a tipping point when the service provider becomes so large that their sheer operating expenses start to necessitate increased costs. Breaking up provides better value in that case.

[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

Can you say "anti-trust"

[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

He's not wrong in this case, it's doable. There are many startups building similar services with arguably fewer starting resources. You should run completely in the other direction, but it's not impossible.

Credit products, especially virtual, are easier to create than ever thanks to companies that have built out that infrastructure. Chequing can be facilitated and held by a major bank under the hood in most cases.

It might not be his end game, but it's definitely possible. Now, forgive me while I weep for anyone that uses it if they manage to deliver it.

[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Great games feel fewer and farther between after this long. Yes, you get a Witcher 3, or Baldur's Gate, or Zelda sometimes. But really, and it sounds fucked up to frame it this way, they're merely excellent. And I've played a lot of excellent games, so unless one is on a tier never before experienced by anyone on Earth, eventually things feel less special for some reason. It's fair to say that some games are innovative, but they are very few. The best we usually get is stuff we've seen before, just insanely well polished/tweaked on ocassion. Ultimately, there's not a lot new if that makes sense. It's sort of a been there done that vibe, and it's probably just a sign you've played too much good shit. Like an addict that has hit the same pipe too many times lol.

[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If I tell you what happens, it won't happen.

[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Apparently, the Zuck fucks

[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think they did?

[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Has to be breaking a rule by this point

[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The design is still horrendous. I was hoping for a total do over.

[–] vasametropolis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It has been predicted for years that the Internet would split and I'm all for it at this point.

view more: next ›