I keep forgetting why sometimes I even use Telegram. It's just there. I don't want their dumb subscription.
soulifix
And almost no firefox user wants to admit that, among the other things Firefox is flawed for. But, "IT'S NOT GOOGLE" is their only rationale.
And the government continues to give them more money. I've figured it out now.
People want better broadband. ISPs promise to broaden internet. Government gives money. ISPs spend a considerable amount of the promise of better broadband in marketing. Doesn't happen. People still want better broadband. ISPs promise again. Government gives more money. ISPs continue spending on marketing.
Over and over.
Can we just fucking retire Captcha already? It can be defeated and there's been proof of that. If it's purpose has been defeated, then it is no longer of use.
If Lemmy's karma system can stay as it is, without adopting the Reddit way of how it handles it, I guess it's fine. Personally, I'd like to at least have some place to go to, that doesn't have likes, doesn't have karma points or anything. Because it just encourages people to groom themselves to say things, that'll garner the most attention. It invalidates your way of thinking and makes you check back on scores to feel validated.
I hate that I can't go almost anywhere anymore, without seeing some stupid form of a karma points system. It serves no purpose. Reddit's is worse because they tie your account to it. Don't have enough? Welp, too bad, can't post here. Got downvoted to oblivion? Welp, too bad, gotta wait some 10 minutes and fill a stupid captcha check.
If Lemmy can avoid that, then fine, I guess.
The landscape was different. Digg was in 2004. Reddit in 2005. They both came in a time where social media was at it's infancy and it was anyone's game to make it big. Whereas today, there are already established social media sites and the best any alternative social media outlet can do anymore, is absorb some numbers and try to prove to be the better alternative. It's a lot about thinking outside the box and figuring what a platform can do that the other can't.
If we're perfectly honest - No.
Reddit has over 53 some odd million users. Million with an M. Lemmy has gained, at most, upwards of just thousands. To call it a 'mass exodus' is really overselling it.
It's going to take a fairly long time, for Lemmy to even scratch 100k even. I'm on both Reddit and Lemmy. Lemmy, for a more positive experience. Reddit, because the numbers are just there.
Okay, so let's go down the list. Musk has bought Twitter so he could:
- Suspend the user that was tracking his plane
- "Own the libs", I mean, he's definitely a republicunt
- Run out all of the news outlets he deemed not trustworthy
- Unban the orange monkey
- Now rebrand Twitter as a letter because he couldn't let go of an era that was far, far better off without his existence
The way I see something as 'unpopular' is that you have to feel strongly about it. I've studied the way some people have posted over on Reddit, on all unpopularopinion based subreddits like 10thDentist, TrueUnpopularOpinion .etc
What I've noted people of doing there is that they're saying the opposite of what people prop as popular, for the sake of being the opposite. They don't feel that strongly about it and you can tell. They'll write a 2-liner post that is very dry, summarizing that they don't like something because everyone else did, just through their own words. It doesn't feel strong, doesn't feel relatable or resonates anything.
I love opinions where someone points at something and has a very vibrant feeling towards it. I'm tired of any of them, unpopular or popular, that are along the lines of "I don't know why I like it, I just do" and "It sucks because...it just sucks and I've got nothing to add to it".
Someone will make that down the road, I'll leave it to them.
Twitter is also zoophile haven too.