This one comment of 4 words triggers me so hard that it momentarily stumped me
When talking about vector space, you usually need the "scalar (field)", and scalars need inverse to be well-defined.
So for integers, the scalar should be integer itself. Sadly, inverse of integers stops being an integer, ~~from where all sorts of number theoretic nightmare occurs~~ Instead, integers form a ring, and is a module over scalar of integers.
It is just to consider polynomials and functions as vectors, and apply our meager intuition on 3d spaces. By introducing norms (size), you recover the "size and direction" analogy.
The space itself has canonical curvature >.>
Wait, that's mostly what I do in many conversations.. damn.
As a TA who barely did a class, so relatable
Meanwhile I lost ability to info dump, and I wish I could do it again.
Infinitesimal approach is often more convoluted when you perform various operations, like exponentials.
Instead, epsilon-delta can be encapsulated as a ball business, then later to inverse image check for topology.
Thanks, I dunno how but this let me see the joke
I am basically autistic with ADHD, so I personally doubt that would work..
That sounds likely for my high school days, but not for middle school ones. That said, people were likely less mature in middle school. I feel like I am very bad at masking, I wonder if it is in effect at all.
Tbh I do not know how many lie on the between, it rather depicts me in undergrad.
Agreed, guess this is unpopular opinion but palworld just looked like a copycat from the get-go, especially the capture mechanic. It is too similar imo.