rational_lib

joined 5 days ago
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

Network effects, boomers being unable to figure out how to switch

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes I do think it was championed by conservative people. And if that statement pisses anyone off, my evidence is that Fannin County GA, where this took place, voted 82% for Trump. It's almost as if the whole "government overreach" thing is just empty marketing for policies that make rich people richer...

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

That's not actually related to my point though. This is more like:

First they tweeted offensive things about women, and I made sure that thing they tweeted is now the only thing we talk about.

Then we couldn't talk about all the women dying of not getting abortions on time because we're too busy talking about tweets.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imagine if there was a hack so bad that it caused everyone to become unable to develop in C and C++.

Classic "let's just make the cure worse than the disease" mindset among security enthusiasts.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 231 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Politically-motivated tea tax, what could go wrong?

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sunk cost fallacy is definitely a subtype, but I'm going for I guess the more general concept of an idea that becomes more popular the worse it does

 

Yes I know, your least-favorite idea goes here. But seriously, someone must have come up with the concept before. Like a bad get-rich-quick scheme could fall into this category, where joining the scheme makes people lose money and become more desperate, so they become more likely to do desperate things like invest more in the scheme. But it can apply to a number of other bad ideas.