murd0x

Wtf is this nonsense..

Ohm no !

It's not art. Expanding the sense of the word to all kinds of nonsensical phenomena is both damaging art and artists as well.

I take the liberty of a personal definition of art, or if not definition, at least prerequisites for something to be considered art, and that is that art must be made by the hand of the artist and that it's conception must include deliberate thought/mental process of the artist. It may not be the best definition, but I consider it to be good enough to draw a definite line between Michelangelo and the internet lady who vlogs about the art of tying your shoelaces or some similar shit.

Definitely not critical. As you said, familiarity can be quite important in a genus-differentia kind of way. For me it definitely was: being familiar to Reddit I could think that Lemmy is just like it but better. Same with Twitter and Mastodon.

Good post, but still raises the issue to a new level: above lemmy, there's another choice: which flavor of the fediverse do I want? twitter-like ? reddit-like ? etc

This worked :)

The point is there is no clear path to use lemmy.. Just because there are so many options.

Just like going for the first time to a Starbucks and asking for a coffee. Some people just want a coffee.. Not the whole headache of choosing.

In this regard, probably a paragraph saying :"here, try this server - it's fast because it's not overcrowded (or any other reason, if any), and try this client - find it on your favourite app store"

This offers the user a baseline for his experience. After he gets the hang of it, when he feels prepared to try the other options, he can do it at his own pace. Not needing to figure out too many things before even trying.

Don't get me wrong, I'm really hoping this will overthrow proprietary platforms, but right now this is my two cents on onboarding. Cheers

And when you get there, you're overwhelmed with options:

Should I use this server? Or this one? What are the differences? Does it matter? Should I create an account on each of the servers I think I'd like? After all.. I can.. but is this how it's supposed to be used?

Well, what is each meant to represent? Should communities be constructed around the concept of topics, or should there be a server for each topic?

And please don't use any variant of "everybody can do it whichever they want", because this just avoids the responsibility of offering a personal answer and shifts it to them.

Personally I think the first (communities=topics)., while servers should provide voluntary redundancy for each other in case one of the servers has an inconvenient change of policies or circumstances for the users.

But I am not on the creative team of Lemmy, so my vision might differ from theirs. Also, I'm willing to change my belief if more solid arguments are presented.

This only states the multiple ways of how one can use lemmy, but neither envisions how one should use it. And vision is important for the non technical user, especially when exploring new grounds, because vision makes him go further. Not infinite overwhelming possibilities, technicalities and potential headaches. It's simple or it's complicated.

This seems to cine around to the topic of merging communities across servers

I was thinking this cold prove necessary in the context of different servers policies. Got example, if my server would change policies to something I am not willing to agree, then it would be nice to migrate to another server