jonathanvmv8f

joined 1 year ago
[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Who's the guy in the second panel? I swear I've seen this guy somewhere recently and it's been seriously bugging me

[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

BTW it's cake day for what was supposed to be a throwaway account

[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago

By the looks of the image, you opened this post on your laptop, opened the camera app of your phone, took a screenshot of the app and took ANOTHER screenshot of the app along with the preview of the previously taken screenshot and finally posted it.

I guess it's your first day too

[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (8 children)
  1. For Linux enthusiasts, how do you decide which distro you would like to try out next among the plethora of options that are available? The difference I perceive between majority of distros gets smaller the more I try to understand about them.

  2. What are the minimum issues I am likely to face using the most beginner friendly distro like Mint for programming and light gaming?

  3. How customizable is the GUI in Linux Mint specifically? What if I want a start menu like Windows 10 with the app list and the blocky app tiles? What about those custom widgets I see in hardcore Linux users' desktops?

  4. I heard there is no concept of file extensions in Linux. How am I supposed to work on my projects that I imported from my Windows machine that do contain extensions?

Bonus: Who creates those distro icons in color coded ASCII in the system info command in the terminal?

 

What if I am just imagining the high pitch sound in my mind whenever I hear about or think of tinnitus just like how someone tells you to imagine a whale and you form a mental image of a whale? I don't pay attention to the noise while I'm busy doing stuff but once I think about it, it is as hard to stop noticing it similar to being told to breathe manually, and it gets very annoying after some time. Is it what tinnitus really is?

[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago
 

My latest personal project would look like this:

[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

I am seeing this comment right after I finished 'Life is Strange'...

Tap for spoilerI think I will stay away from time travel for now

 
[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 46 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (15 children)

Tbh I've kind of forgetten what little French I managed to learn earlier, so this wouldn't work for me either

 
 

For me, it is any city/building construction game like City Skylines, Two Point Hospital, Planet Zoo etc.

[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

On a completely unrelated note, I had a first glance at the thumbnail of this article and I was convinced the photo was taken in real life until I noticed the 'cybernetic seam' on the subject's face. I almost couldn't recognise this as an in-game screenshot and I already consider myself adept in recognising such images.

[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

thank mr skeltal

[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

I need more blog posts like these...

 

Just a shower thought. Seeing how these structures took decades to build in their times, and that too entirely with manual labour, I was wondering how long these architectural marvels would take to be built in this post modern era with the help of our technological advancements.

Imagine the world has dedicated its focus and the entirety of its resources on building just one Pyramid as quickly as possible out of the same materials and in the same location as the original ones. The medium of construction has no constraints but the end result must be indistinguishable, structure and composition wise.

I would love to hear how the process would take place in addition.

 

I believe lighting plays a very important part in making a scene realistic when it comes to creating one artificially, like in 3D modelling. That is why I also think the lighting of these AI generated images is the prime source of what impresses people about these images since no matter how unrealistic or distorted the subject is, the lighting makes it look like a natural part of the background. This is clearly different from photos like from poorly Photoshopped ones where the subject feels deliberately inserted into the scene from a cutout.

I am interested to understand how LLMs understand the context of the lighting when creating images. Do they make use of samples which happen to have the exact same lighting positions or do they add the lighting as an overlay instead? Also, why is it that lighting doesn't look convincing in some cases like having multiple subjects together etc.?

[–] jonathanvmv8f@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

Is it good to be engaged enough to be recognised in Lemmy? I don't know if the big players around here are just spending their entire day on Lemmy as many people on Redditors do. There is a small part of me that too wishes to be recognized as an active member in this community but I don't want it at the expense of my real life.

 
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›