bostonbananarama

joined 1 year ago
[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If it makes you feel any better, that house would sell for at least double that price where I live.

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Yes, I'm on one side, with dictionaries, etymology, and the majority of atheists, and you're on the other side. I would agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.

Google:

noun: atheism. disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Gnostic - adjective. relating to knowledge, especially esoteric mystical knowledge.

Me:

Theism is belief in a god, atheism is a lack of belief. Atheism is not necessarily a belief that god does not exist.

Gnostic is about knowledge and not belief

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Theism is belief in a god, atheism is a lack of belief. Atheism is not necessarily a belief that god does not exist. Gnostic is about knowledge and not belief, which is why you can have an agnostic theist. Agnostic is not a middle ground between theism and atheism, there is no middle ground. I can correct you, but I can't make you understand it.

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

What I said is absolutely correct. If you have a disagreement perhaps you should be more clear and less snarky.

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Atheism is the belief that there are no gods and out right rejection in the belief of any gods.

No, not quite. Atheism is not believing in a god, it doesn't mean you claim there is not a god. A subtle difference, but it is the difference between not believing, and believing not. Also, agnosticism isn't a middle ground between theism and atheism, there is no middle ground, as it is dichotomous. Agnosticism speaks to knowledge, or what you claim to know. So, a person could be an agnostic atheist, or an agnostic theist.

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There is, it's the constitution. You can't be a member of the House without being 25 or a senator without being 30.

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I never understand people who make comments like this, what were you expecting going into Twisters? Citizen Kane? I watched Twisters today, it was a mindlessly fun little movie, exactly as expected.

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

That's a scary thought, guard your fireplace!

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're just saying libertarian in more words.

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (3 children)

People need to stop with ridiculous conspiracy theories. You've become what you hate

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because someone needs to be enslaved to provide universial health care. If even one person wants to opt out, no matter how wrong their reason you if you allow don't allow it they are enslaved.

Congratulations, you just said the dumbest thing I've read on the Internet in a very long time. That's impressive!

I pay for the military, for roads, for schools, for police, for fire departments...and I can't opt out of any of that. So am I already a slave? If so, then I might as well get some healthcare out of the deal.

If I'm not already a slave then universal healthcare isn't making me a slave either. No one would be forcing you to use your healthcare either.

view more: next ›