[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Maybe try Antarctica as an example? There are a few people there, and it seems quite possible to settle without conflict (assuming some treaty alterations). Some atoll no one uses all the time? Maybe a lost cause, bloodfart doesn't seem all that interested in the good faith distinction you are pointing out.

I see your point though; the distinction, to me, motivates using less neutrally connoted wording. Something like "invaders" or "raiders". Nice and clear to everyone.

B seems rather intent on making sure the neutral word is seen as a morally charged one. Seems like making one hard project into two projects and thus just increasing the difficulty to me.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Spree

Pocket Coffee

Dum Dums

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

You meant, pointless makes roundabouts traffic lights?

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I was too young to vote at the time, but the charts and graphs thing was rad.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Hmm... Katamari Damacy, Braid, Portal 1 2 combo. Subnautica.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Iirc, the future government (? I guess) weren't trying to find the source to stop the release, but to get a pure sample to study so as to cure the disease in the future. The lady on the plane was there to get the sample.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

If their art doesn’t make enough money then it’s clearly not in enough demand.

Unless you burden the word 'enough' with far too much work in that sentence, then that implication doesn't necessarily follow. It is possible for something to be in great demand by those without money to spend. Furthermore, it is possible for there to be issues with the logistics between the source and the demand (e.g. demand is very physically distributed, or temporally limited and/or sporadic).

Money is a very particular way of empowering and aggregating only some demand. It ties the power of demand to history and not moral or egalitarian considerations for one.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Ditto.

Canceling cable used to be, at the very least, a long, phone call that alternated between stretches of hold music dulling the senses and combative sales technique verbal jousting. Canceling a streaming service... I don't think that has ever taken me more than four minutes of finding a webpage and clicking. The collective consciousness is in danger of forgetting/underplaying just how far we have come on this.

If pirating ever takes less than four minutes every other month, I guess it will have reached convenience parity. But it certainly wasn't that back when I was in that game. And I really, really doubt it is now.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Are We Ready For This Site's Endless Feed of AI-Generated Piped Links?

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

When it first took big bites out of Firefox, it wasn't slight at all. I have only my hazy human memory on this, but some pals and I ran a test script at the time. Iirc, Chome would routinely load enough to start reading in 2 seconds while Firefox was more like 6 on average with our site list and went over 10 way too often to ignore.

It had been very easy before that to blame the sites for all the crud they were larding in. But it was like Google's clean, fast search page compared to Yahoo's "junk you don't need" frontpage all over again. Chrome won on speed fair and square.

Thus ends this yarn by one internet fogey.

view more: next ›

Magnergy

joined 1 year ago