KillingTimeItself

joined 10 months ago

and you'd be the stupidest person in the room if you did.

the military might be the only thing that stops him. Hence why i didn't include it.

But i have no idea. Literally every other duty, and every other branch will be under the whims of the stupidest person in america right now.

the pandemic was really the only significant player here, since it stopped world trade.

Sure russia is a fair example, but here in the US we barely felt it, and we did pretty quickly close up the trade problems.

i'm sure countries are moving away from it, and ensuring industry a bit, that's not surprising, it happens everytime. It's going to get outsourced later eventually. And they're not going to onshore every single industry either, it's simply not possible.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

you realize places without elections still have them, they just mean nothing right?

he doesnt even have to touch the military, just has to certify fraudulent voter slates, that's it.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago (5 children)

trump just barely failed to steal it last time, this time he has the fucking supervillain crackpot team behind him.

If he wants to do it, all he has to do is make the call.

He has the executive, he has the house, he has the senate, he will most likely completely have the supreme court, there is literally nobody to tell him no anymore.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 3 days ago (4 children)

anywhere from not really, to literally world war 3.

trump is a loose cannon.

We do not win here.

Which of those projects will be ready by the time China invades Taiwan in early 2025? And how will those factories absorb all the global orders for chips when they’re not ready?

for one, there's no guarantee. Trump should want to protect taiwan, as it's a strategically convenient point of interest.

You are agreeing with me. Fabs are hard. Our people are stupid.

well sort of, your argument is "well its hard and difficult so why should we ever try" my argument is "doing literally anything at all is going to be a better move."

Their people are smart. If their people are tied up in a war and dying, and their fabs are destroyed, and our fabs are half built

yeah idk i think they would probably move to the US. The place where they are most likely to be able to fabricate again.

you are unironically concern trolling with this post.

there are two big arguments for a denser layout, notably you move your hands less, which means you can type faster, statistically speaking. It makes it easier. Generally you see typing speed track roughly with this over time.

And since you move your hands less, it's ergonomically better for typing, so you get less strain, you have better ergonomics in general, you can type longer, and even faster since there is less strain.

Different layouts optimize for different things, some optimize for efficient roll combinations, some optimize for switching between hands as optimally as possible. Some don't really do any of that (qwerty) which also have a significant impact on typing.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

nice shitpost homie, maybe if you had some reading comprehension you would be able to understand the intellectual argument here.

"NUH UH UR WRONG L TAKE DUMBASS" this is literally you right now.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

that's only true if you're a trump supporter, it's absolutely true if you're not. There are most definitely concerns to be had, as there always are, but globalism is fundamentally good for the economy. There is no world in which this isn't true, so you should push towards globalism, even if there is some risk, because it will likely stabilize relations significantly.

view more: next ›