[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

They are going after billionaires and big corporations now that they received more funding. Maybe after they collect the large backwards owed, they will go after those violating 501 c3 status.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Hopefully the IRS gets ahold of the news.

"Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes."

https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/restriction-of-political-campaign-intervention-by-section-501c3-tax-exempt-organizations

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm sure all the fact food places will still run ads. They will just feature salads or coffee or the toy that comes with the meal, as long as if doesn't show or talk about the junk food options.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It's only fair for the pets to eat us as well.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

I can remember a time that after a search, you'd just have a list of links. No extra boxes on the side or even an images tab, just the list of links. At the bottom of the page was the word "Google" and there would be more O's, as they were links to other pages of results.

If there were sponsored links, it didn't say so and you'd end up with different sites at the top of the list. So I don't think way back there were.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Omg, that's basically how it's been in TX too. Just 3-5 degrees cooler up there. Y'all shouldn't be burning up like that

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

The US isn't any more concerned about sexual orientation now than any point in the past. Back in colonial times, it wouldn't have been safe to be anything other than straight with all the hyper religious colonists. They were even forcing their gender conformity and the straight sexual orientation on the Native Americans. Baron Friedrich von Steuben got a pass for being gay, probably because he was the one in charge of training the troops for Washington. 100 years ago, you could be killed on the street for being anything other than straight or denied jobs. The Lavender scare of the mid century brought this more to light. The AIDS crisis that started in the 80s and bled through into the 90s and 2000s as new medicines were being invented, further brought negative light to sexual orientations outside of straight. The cause of all of this attention to sexual orientation has been the religions brought over by colonists.

In recent years, sexual orientations outside of straight are finally being seen in a positive light with Lawrence v TX (2003) legalizing same-sex relationships and Hodges v Obergefell (2015) legalizing same-sex marriages. In Bostock v Clayton County (2020) legal protections against job discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity were finally put into place over 70 years after the start of the Lavender Scare.

The attention to sexual orientation has always been part of North American history. It has just changed from acceptance with the Native American peoples to hate, death, and intolerance under the colonists, to a more accepting present day. With some of the positive news in recent years, it can be easy to forget (if you're surrounded by progressives in a blue state) that the hate of sexuality injected into North America in the 15th Century still has hold over large portions of the population today.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, it's just like growing up. I remember as a kid hoping the weather would finally cool down by Halloween so we wouldn't sweat through our costumes. In fact there were a couple years that we changed which costume we were going to buy because it would have been too hot to wear.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Don't forget, insurance covers 50% before the deductible is met, not after. When a policy has that verbiage, usually there's a footnote that states how those claims are handled in the future. From what I've seen, that could mean that insurance will cover 100% of said procedure after the deductible is met or it could mean a co-insurance of 30%.

After the deductible is met, OP won't necessarily pay 50%. The percentage of the bill that OP and/or insurance will pay will be on a footnote at the bottom of the blue plan overview page (at least it's blue when looking at plans from the ACA marketplace).

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

If you've met your deductible, you may not owe for the upcoming procedure.

However, you'd need to look at your policy or call the insurance company to see if the procedure counts towards your deductible. Normally the plan specifies that its 50% before the deductible and by an asterisk or buried somewhere in your plan's terms, it may say that it'll be 100% covered after tour deductible is met.

Is your deductible and out-of-pocket max the same? If you've met both, you may not even owe a copay. If you still haven't met the out-of-pocket max, you will still owe co-pays.

Your plan documents or the company will be able to give better answers, as companies and plans can be very different in how they cover things.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Is there a particular VPN router that you suggest?

Also, is there a subscription fee or something for the VPN usage?

Thank you so much for the info!

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Is there a way to put a VPN on the router, so that all devices are covered?

view more: next ›

GlendatheGayWitch

joined 9 months ago