[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

~$2500USD/ea, for anyone else as curious as me

[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago

Out of curiosity, what’s wrong with medium? (Serious question)

[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

@kde@floss.social - are these available somewhere as full res pictures already? And/or will they be after the desktop is chosen? Or will only the chosen one be available?

[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago

Must be part of Reddit’s new rebrand

[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

Although if y’all sold a stuffed animal of whatever adorable thing is in the middle right picture, I’d buy it in a heartbeat

[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 4 points 9 months ago

Top left gives me amazing vibes

[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Great explanation. Yes - I’ve done this before! Built up a system with a RAID array but then realized I wanted a different boot drive. Didn’t really want to wait for dual 15Tb arrays to rebuild - and luckily for me, I didn’t have to! Because the metadata is saved on the discs themselves. If I had to guess (I could be wrong though) - I believe ‘sudo mdadm —scan —examine’ should probably bring up some info about the discs, or something similar to that command.

[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

It kinda looks like a marigold to me. If the leaves are crunchy, it’s underwatered. There’s a chance that some of it is still alive so you may see some small growth start to pop up - but usually, everything that’s crunchy is totally dead. If it’s mushy or limp, it’s underwatered - which unfortunately is probably worse.

[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Is it a hardware raid or a software raid? If it’s software (not sure abt hardware), the discs themselves should have the array’s metadata on it, and you can just use mdraid & restart the array.

[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I’d personally be super surprised if they were outsourcing their firmware engineering - but I do suppose it’s technically possible.

[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Ahh, yeah. Neither would I. I would expect my USB sticks to last longer than that, lol.

That aside - here’s a fun fact. We sell the NAND from scrapped SSDs that we no longer need for development to a third-party vendor that actually desolders it and uses it for flash drives. So… you never really know what kinda flash storage you get on your flash drives! (Or… we did do this, until the program recently got shuttered because NAND is so damn cheap now)

[-] Doombot1@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I do agree with the plastic brick part - but there is actually reasoning behind that second part - the read-only mode. That happens when the flash is down to a very low amount of life left (usually predetermined by the manufacturer). It is by design because the flash will degrade further if you continue to write to it, so by forcing it to read-only mode, users can still recover their data in a failing/aging SSD. Not to say it isn’t a huge pain in the ass when that happens though, lol

view more: next ›

Doombot1

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF