this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
324 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59674 readers
3139 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta has 30 days to stop using the name

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 180 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Same name, same industry - digital messaging.

If Meta didn’t have a massive amount of money and lawyers, this would be a VERY easy case to win.

Meta decided they wanted the name, tried to buy it, and then opted to knowingly rip it out of a smaller company’s hands. What a bunch of assholes.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why was he hell bent on using the name Threads. Every time I hear it makes me think of the Dragon Riders or Pern. Not messaging app. Fuck Meta hope the real Threads company wins.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I agree with the last sentence but Threads seems like a completely appropriate name for the service. Online conversations have been called threads for decades

[–] sour@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

social media platform called posts when

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right but it could've had a nonsense name, like Troods.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

....Troods would have been enough for me to try it out so fair point

I'd fucking love Troods.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That just makes it too generic to trademark then. Imagine an automaker called "Cars".

[–] hai@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Or a social media platform called "X."

[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 3 points 1 year ago

The name just reminds me of the film. So I just assume that like the film the site is nightmare fuel and avoid it.

[–] anonionfinelyminced@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

"Drummer, beat, and piper, blow,
Harper, strike, and soldier, go.
Free the flame and sear the grasses
Till the dawning Red Star passes."

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

It makes me think of the apocalyptic nuclear war drama. Quite appropriate.

A dragon must fly when there are Threads in the sky.

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

To be fair, apps like that do tend to encourage people to isolate themselves at home, rather than going to meet people outside.

[–] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a bunch of assholes.

Yeah, it's really surprising that an ethical, upstanding company like Meta would pull a dick move like that. It's so out of character.

[–] mark@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

an ethical, upstanding company like Meta

the hardest I've laughed this week 🥲

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

It seems like money shouldn't be able to buy a win in court for something so obvious, but here we are.

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They should rename it to Twitter

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

Omg so much yes

[–] The_Vampire@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a very high chance Musk still has the rights to that trademark, unfortunately.

[–] 1847953620@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[–] magmaus3@szmer.info 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

didn't it take "Meta" name as well?

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

Because that’s what you do when you’re a trust find baby with no guard rails and plenty of money.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 15 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Dr. John Yardley, Threads Ltd’s managing director told Gizmodo in an email that Threads Ltd. waited four months to reach out to Meta to obtain enough legal advice to ensure they could “proceed with action with any reasonable confidence of winning it.”

Threads Ltd., owned by JPY Ltd., widely promoted the company since 2014, two years after it trademarked its name.

The company said in its letter that since its inception, it has licensed nearly 1,000 organizations globally and claims its sales are growing by an average of 200% per year.

“We recognize that this is a classic ‘David and Goliath’ battle with Meta,” Yardley said in the letter.

Meta launched Threads in June and gained 100 million users within the first five days, surpassing its competitor X.

A month later, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said more than half of Threads users stopped using the platform.


The original article contains 393 words, the summary contains 146 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Lizzy_Wizzy@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Not a chance this holds up. But maybe an easy payout for the little guy

I don't even remember them anymore, I haven't heard from them since the endless news of their fast rise. How are they doing?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

When I think of threads I think of