this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
1053 points (97.8% liked)

Memes

45731 readers
1114 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kadu@lemmy.world 151 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"Instagram owner"

Have they paid the publication for this weird title? It's Meta. Are they so ashamed they believe calling it a Meta service would mean less users?

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 134 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Also, are we all going to pretend that Meta isn't just Facebook, the company that sold all our data to Cambridge Analytica for a quick buck, a company who then used that data to direct target right leaning moderate, pump them full of anxiety and fear, and turn them into Trump devotees? A company that then later didn't store that data properly and leaked it, allowing thousands of identities to be stolen (including mine)? Meta / Facebook / Instagram are not good actors on the internet and we should be doing more to sully their name

[–] the_artic_one@programming.dev 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not saying that Facebook/Meta aren't terrible but this is a misunderstanding of what happened with Cambridge Analytica.

Facebook didn't sell anything to Cambridge Analyitica. Their API at the time allowed CA to gather information about you and all of your friends when you took one of their free personality quizzes (during the era when 90% of Facebook was people sharing personality quizzes).

When Facebook found out what CA had done, they fixed their API to prevent it from happening again (not because they cared about user privacy but because CA got a bunch of information from them that they could use to target advertisements on their own without paying FB to run ads) and covered it up so their users wouldn't know how massively negligent they had been with their data.

So it's not that Facebook was wantonly selling you data to shady characters so much as they were carelessly leaking your data to any shady characters who happened by.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

It may just be me but I feel like that is even worse. Because who knows who got a hold of it now.

[–] Grant@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Don't forget that the groups they targeted were as small as 10 people. Facebook is the reason our world is a shit as it is now. Fuck meta. Fuck Facebook. Fuck all of them. I despise them with deeper hatred than 99.99% of the things I have ever known

[–] psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago

Don't forget that they paid teens to (unbeknownst to them) install a vpn and collect all their data, including message content

They also used a hacky mechanism bc they knew they were breaking the app store rules

Facebook / Meta / the instagram owner is evil as fuck

[–] SevFTW@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Well, we aren't. But if you mean "we" as in "humans". Then yes, we've already forgotten and we don't care anymore if you remind us. You're being a paranoid nerd, I don't get all this techy crap, and I'm sure Mark has learned his lesson or at the very least the government will do something.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do mean "we" as in "humans." I think you're setting yourself up for disappointment if you think Mark Zuckerberg is going to pivot permanently away from the most profitable set of activities his company ever engaged in.

You're based on a Germany focused instance, I see. You're probably more safe from the kinds of things Facebook gets up to than we are on our side of the Atlantic. Over here, Facebook paid $100,000,000 in fines for their behavior. This was 3.3% of the original fine. No regulatory changes were made. It's unknown how much money Facebook made from data brokering with Cambridge Analytica, but they sold the data of 87 million users. Disturbingly, the number of users Facebook who directly participated in the app used to siphon this data was around 270,000. In other words, Facebook didn't even need people to interact with Facebook directly to collect information about people, since they were using network connection information to build profiles about people.

THIS is my concern about why they're so hot to get on the Fediverse right now. They don't want a huge number of users to sign up for Threads. If numerous users do, that would help them greatly with what they do want, though. They want insight into the greater distributed network of the Fediverse. They want to collect information about Mastodon, Pelorma, Friendica, Calckey, Miskey, BookWyrm, KBin, and Lemmy users who interact with users on Threads.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jplexer@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Well I guess this is because it is called "Threads, an Instagram app"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] palebluedot@discuss.tchncs.de 65 points 1 year ago

Honestly, it's scary. For people that are unaware, there's an amazing resource on privacy-respecting alternatives to popular services and softwares: https://www.privacyguides.org. They are also on Lemmy if you have any question.

[–] OtakuAltair@vlemmy.net 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mastodon is already pretty active, and is also part of the fediverse

[–] ElPussyKangaroo@social.fossware.space 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The unfortunate reality is that unlike us, most of the Twitter users could not care less about making choices, let alone privacy. Twitfaces can't calm down and talk without going ballistic and you think they'll willingly look into what federated social media is?

[–] OtakuAltair@vlemmy.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Alot of them are moving though thanks to twitter repeatedly fucking up, I've been seeing some artists and such on mastodon recently that were only on twitter before.

People just need to spread the word; there isn't a marketing campaign or anything for the fediverse after all.

[–] acrxhd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are the marketing campaign.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JesusTheCarpenter@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This post is Meta.

On a serious note, can we appreciate Meta's marketing team for the timing of this announcement. They waited for Twitter to bleed to kick it in the shins.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Mastodon is the federated equivalent of twitter the same way lemmy can be considered the federated alternative of reddit. That's the nice Twitter alternative you are looking for.

[–] cavemeat@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This is what I've been telling everyone. Don't go to threads, go to mastodon.

[–] Deed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This would be great but most people will not care and sacrifice data for convinence. Wish the government cared as much about us big tech as they did TikTok.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you lost me at "Instagram"

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

That's impossible, Instagram already knows your gps coordinates...

[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

installs app

Declines everything

"To use the app You need to allow-"

Uninstalls app

[–] athlon@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Facebook makes a product that squeezes every last drop from your privacy? Nooooooo waaaay!

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ahem. They're called Meta.

But seriously, fuck anything Zuckerberg owns.

[–] RoosterBoy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I don't care what they all themselves, they are always going to be Facebook.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] IHateRedditAndSpez@programming.dev 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Instagram owner" just say Meta lol

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

We all know it's the Zucc, you don't gotta lie of omission to kick it.

[–] tentphone@lemmy.fmhy.ml 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why the first reaction frame? Instagram is owned by Meta, of course they're going to have incredibly invasive data collection policies.

[–] noah@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

I expected some data collection but to be honest, have not expected as much (especially location etc., although this can be partly deactivated). But maybe I was too trusting in this case 😅

[–] S147@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great, another Meta privacy brea... I mean service I can stay away from.

[–] tappyturtle@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

No no, you were right the first time

[–] NoPolToday@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago
[–] EcstaticHumility@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mastodon is a viable option, but then again, this app does some basic automatic account creation from existing FB data and follow people from it. This alone will impress some non-tech journalist and praise it. We have become too lazy to get out of the burning house and save our life.

I wonder if any of that break some GPDR or California Data laws.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] doomkernel@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago

Yeah.. Meta the owner of Facebook/Instagram/WhatsApp wants to collect data from you? Shocker

[–] Ab_intra@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is anyone really supprised?

[–] stebo02@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not the fact they want to collect our data but it's the kind of data that's concerning.

"Sensitive info". Does Zucky want to collect data about the size of our peepees?

"Other data". Aka "literally whatever the fuck we want"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Looks to me that Zuck is trying to compete with Truth Social -- no way this garbage will be Federated.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

twitter alternative, is mastodon, everything else is companies trying to cache with fediverse

[–] Jackolantern@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah I don’t get why they need all these permissions. Crazy

[–] luckystarr@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

Because they want it. It's the main reason why they've built the app.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quills@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At least we have all the fediverse micro-blogging section

And here!

[–] s_v@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago
[–] projectmoon@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is this the alleged decentralized/federated Twitter app that Facebook has been working on?

[–] csigma@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yup, but it's not even integrated with ActivityPub yet

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rizoid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My big hope from this is that people might learn more about federated content and the fediverse in general. Then they can move away from stuff meta makes into the actual private internet.

I'm reeeeeal cautious about it. There's a Dr. Strange level of one positive ending, and that's where users log into FB's not twitter, discover a ton of content on mastadon and lemmy, subscribe, and then when they eventually try to sever the connection (when, not if), most of the content is over here and people want to switch.

[–] andarwaid@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Even tho the meme is using "disappointed black guy", I wouldn't be surprised or disappointed actually.

It's meta, what else can someone expect from them?

load more comments
view more: next ›