282
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 118 points 11 months ago

id be more excited for this if it wasnt adobe.. fuck adobe

[-] BaronVonBort@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago

You get the dress but have to subscribe to Dress Cloud for $50/mo and if you decide to discontinue it the dress randomly turns into a 90s era WB shirt and locks itself that way until you re-up

[-] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 18 points 11 months ago

If you subscribe for a whole year it only costs 599$ !

[-] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 109 points 11 months ago

Adobe: Pay $1699 yearly subscription or it will go transparent.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

Me, hacking Adobe and cancelling all subscriptions during the oscars: "You're welcome"

[-] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 95 points 11 months ago

That’s a cute dress. If I pirate it, will I get a Creative Cloud warning pop up when it dials home?

[-] Kerrigor@kbin.social 48 points 11 months ago

You have to subscribe or else it just goes transparent.

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

How can I cancel her subscription?

[-] deleted@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

CC.exe has stopped working.

Ok Report to Microsoft

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Just update your host file so it can't connect to adobe.com

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 75 points 11 months ago

"Hurry up, we're gonna be late for our reservation."

"Hold on, my dress has to install an update!"

[-] netburnr@lemmy.world 66 points 11 months ago

I will wait until the gimp version is released

[-] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 11 months ago

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[-] reflex@kbin.social 58 points 11 months ago

They gonna release an ad-supported version to turn you into a walking billboard?

[-] ansis@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

Is it gold or blue I can't tell

[-] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago
[-] krayj@sh.itjust.works 32 points 11 months ago

This article desperately needs video.

Here's the official video from Adobe. Bump to 45s into the vid to see the dress in action:

https://youtu.be/EvGquKkSFMM?si=_yo33O7N6VhFxYQO

[-] figaro@lemdro.id 9 points 11 months ago

Honestly lol what kind of absurd article doesn't include the video

[-] QHC@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

That video is included in the article, it's just at the very bottom for some reason.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/EvGquKkSFMM?si=_yo33O7N6VhFxYQO

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 23 points 11 months ago

you know you are talking to an engineer when they say

Non-emissive material with reflective light-diffuser modules

instead of "mirrors"

[-] huginn@feddit.it 7 points 11 months ago

I believe most mirrors can't turn their reflectivity on and off based on an electric current.

I could be totally wrong about mirrors though

[-] leftzero@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

You just haven't turned the current high enough.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Still no pockets though.

[-] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

And you can totally just throw it in the washing machine, right?

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Dry clean only of course

[-] Gregorech@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

It's like the dress Rorschach made his mask from in Watchmen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Dope@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

For some reason I’m not super impressed with this. Looks too much like you’re wearing e-ink panels. Call me when these are fully functioning OLEDs that kinetically charge when you walk.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Each one of those scales operates as an independent display, and coordinating them is quite a challenge. I'd be interested in knowing what is driving them, because it's surely not very portable.

[-] Dope@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I’m sure orchestrating this isn’t super easy (however, if you treat every “display” as a “pixel”, Idk how this coding is different than a woman wearing a dress made of addressable LEDs— on the surface it doesn’t seem super complicated engineering), but it appears as unimpressive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] robocall@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

OMG she's wearing the same dress she wore last week! She just changed the design!

[-] nothing@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago

And why do you want this?

Or was this a "We can build it so we did"?

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 23 points 11 months ago

Because it’s awesome and also yes.

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 20 points 11 months ago

I miss when everyone wasn't super pessimistic about absolutely everything and it was ok to do things for these reasons

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Reminds me of the book The Diamond Age, where the clothes used nanotech to transform and become waterproof etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Hey look its the prototype for Metal Gear Solid.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
282 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
4192 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS