So true, and then stupid libs will say "erm acturally those homes look ugly" or "seeing bread lines makes me uncomfortable" as if homelessness and starvation is a better alternative.
this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
166 points (95.6% liked)
Communism
2083 readers
329 users here now
Welcome to the communist Lemmy community! This is a community for all Marxist.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The very same people who call effective, government-provided housing "ugly" are the ones who pay almost several grand a month for a cubicle with paper-thin walls. Crazy world we live in.
Ah but you see those crazy inefficient cubicles with no room and walls you can literally punch a hole in have fancy and trendy paint jobs, they might also have a fancy smart tv that plays advertisements 24/7 and a smart speaker that listens for any sign of dissent. All that for the small price of $7,000 a month (with a 20%-50% rent increase year on year). Truly modern living the way liberalism intended.
Not to mention that the bread lines came AFTER the liberalisation of said communist countries.
With big housing projects making a pleasant looking place to live is important, but less so than giving people a place to live
You could totally sleep underneath that bench armrest if you wriggled your way in.
Can confirm
Their system depends to impoverishment of somebodies and they still hate from poor people. That's hypocritical.
I sometimes think some of the psyops followed here from reddit because there ain't no way every living adult human doesn't immediately recognize this as anti-homeless design.