this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
-56 points (19.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31122 readers
3032 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not a big fan of moderation being at the whims of whoever has an agenda.

Are there lemmy instances that take moderation seriously and don't just ban/censor people they disagree with? So far it looks like the mods in lemmy.world instances are very flippant with their moderation and I'm curious if anyone has filled the void yet for a better instance.

Edit: Thanks for everyone who tried to give a legitimate response. No thanks to those who just wanted to spout their talking points or debate the merits of freedom of speech; that was never the point of this thread.

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] splinter@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 6 minutes ago

https://hilariouschaos.com/ does not ban/censor people we disagree with, we do not moderate based on political lines. This statement applies to the instance; individual communities run by other users will moderate according to their own standards.

Our rules around content are covered in our terms of service, we expect everyone who joins to agree to these terms and respect them, but as an instance we do not have an agenda.

This is pretty unpopular on Lemmy, we get called many names and get shunned a lot for it. Nevertheless, you are welcome to join if this sounds appealing to you.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Without exception, whenever someone is looking for "free speech", this applies:

https://m.xkcd.com/1357/

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago

100% what's happening here.

"I want to be an arse with impunity!"

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe uncharitably, my first thought when reading a post like this is "what shitty thing do you want to say?".

But I don't know you so maybe I am being uncharitable.

But you have to realise the fediverse in general is not owned by capitalist orgs with high priced legal teams. Its mostly small teams of private individuals. If someone posts something illegal, including defamatory, in their legal jurisdiction (which is probably not the USA) then they might be on the hook for it too.

Even if you run your own instance if you're enough of a dick it'll get defederated or you'll be banned from multiple instances/communities.

Learn to play nice in other peoples yard. Its hard sometimes but just walking away and blocking is the best option. Sometimes I need to make more effort to do that too.

[–] armsfulmetathes@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Defederation isn't an on/off switch.

If enough freedom of speech instances get defederated from the censorship instances, it will just create 2 different sections of the fediverse.

Right now, it doesn't look like there's any section of the fediverse that supports freedom of speech.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

What exactly do you mean by "Freedom of Speech"? What are you trying to say that would be censored? Is what you want to say actually covered by freedom of speech?

As you used speech and not expression I am guessing you are USian? This is what freedom of speech relates to:

"The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment and has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech. The First Amendment's constitutional right of free speech, which is applicable to state and local governments under the incorporation doctrine,[6] prevents only government restrictions on speech, not restrictions imposed by private individuals or businesses unless they are acting on behalf of the government.[7] "

[–] CptHacke@lemm.ee 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I view moderation as 'the rules of the house'. When you go to another person's house, you are expected to abide by their (hopefully sane and sensible) rules. If you don't, you are asked to leave. Sometimes, you are forcibly removed if things escalate. If you don't like the rules of the house, or you can't find common ground with the people there, don't go there.

[–] armsfulmetathes@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, that's the purpose of this thread.

I'm trying to find instances that support freedom of speech.

[–] CptHacke@lemm.ee 6 points 4 hours ago

So, you're looking for a more 'consequence-free' instance? Is that an accurate statement?

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

You should read this on why seemingly arbitrary, but nuanced moderation is needed to have a friendly space online.

There exist instances that have more of a free-speech "focus", but despite that most instances cannot tolerate intolerance, harassment, trolling, illegal or borderline illegal stuff. There is generally more tolerance for disagreement on Lemmy than other forums, where unpopular takes are heavily downvoted instead of removed.

A common sequence of events that happens with trolls or flamebaiters:

  • Troll says something unpopular, but not rule breaking (comment downvoted but not removed by mods)
  • Several other people respond/rebut
  • Troll continues a long back-and-forth argument that gets nowhere, or resorts to ad hominems, slurs or personal attacks (rule-breaking)
  • comments get reported
  • Mods remove the entire thread including the initial comment, and give out a community ban
  • Troll decries censorship of the initial not rule-breaking comment, when it was the follow up that was the problem.

So yeah, it's to keep out the jerks. Behave well, think of others as you speak, then you will find yourself able to say more than in places with professed free-speech absolutism. If you don't like that, start your own instance so that no one can moderate you in your own space, and watch the jerks, trolls and spammers roll in after a while.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

that's an unpopular opinion.

should we report you for trolling?

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not an admin, so I can't stop you from doing that. I'm not sure why you're asking for my permission.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I'm pointing out your hypocrisy.

you're saying it's ok that some unpopular opinions are silenced because the greater good demands it, but who dictates the greater good? is it you? is it me? no, it's the mods.

at which point do the communities that you or I build stop becoming our communities and become the mods curated community?

IMO we don't need mods because social moderation is a real mechanic that should be employed on a platform.

[–] armsfulmetathes@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for not helping at all.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago)

So yeah, it's to keep out the jerks.

Thanks for not helping at all.

Narrator: yet one still made its way in.

Edit: all of my comments in this thread went from +3 to -1 while all of op's heavily downvoted everything is now less so, all in the last few minutes. Army of alts to the rescue!

[–] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 9 hours ago

I haven't noticed any moderation issues on lemmy.dbzer0.com

Mind if I ask what exactly you feel like is being censored?

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 33 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

A completely unmoderated instance would be defederated because it would end up filled with stuff that would get you raided by police.

Can you give an example of a rule that you feel is excessively strict and maybe we can come up with an instance where the enforcement is less strict.

A completely unmoderated instance [...]

OP doesn't ask for "unmoderated" instance though, they are explicitly asking for an instance that "takes moderation seriously". Moderation is absolutely not the same thing as censorship.

[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 42 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Freedom of speech means you can say what you want. It doesn't mean others have to listen or like it.

If you don't like moderation, it's probably best to run your own instance.

[–] ERROR_100_000_100@infosec.pub 25 points 11 hours ago

No, I doubt any instance is gonna allow to say things like the n-word or "I don't think people that are [Race/Ethnicity] should be allowed to exist".

Any instance that allows you to say that should be defederated.

Can you claify what you mean by "free speech"? Give a few example comments?

[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Your freedom stops where other peoples freedom start.

All instances, except tankie ones, have freedom of speech.

Definition varies for example between Europe and US. In Europe you have freedom FROM, in the US it’s more like freedom TO.

Freedom TO can be dangerous as some peoples think that it means they are allowed to say hateful and harmful things. Hurting others is not freedom of speech, it’s just being the shit stain on humanity toilet paper roll and you won’t have that on lemmy. Unless by creating your own no-rules instance that will get defederated by everyone.

But as long as you are not insulting and harming people, yeah you have freedom of speech everywhere, just the normal sane amount of freedom.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

yeah, all that is bullshit.

I've experienced mostly ok mods on world, but there are several that were clearly editing for their agenda.

I got banned from news for "obvious troll is obvious". I wasn't trolling, I was dead fucking serious. yet, all the comments that were responding to me that were breaking actual rules were left alone.

it's clear to me, because I've experienced it, that lemmy.world is biased towards setting a narrative because it has no way to report bad mods.

eventually it's going to be a curated cesspool just like Reddit became.

[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Maybe, I tend to avoid big instances and news. I also heard stuff about news.world mod so I’m not surprised about what you said.

But I believe it is one dude on one community on one instance, there are still plenty of news community outside of world, ml and (former) grad so they are easy to avoid.

And it doesn’t change the fact that free speech != spewing hate so if some are looking for that kind of freedom, well, they can look elsewhere.

[–] armsfulmetathes@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for not helping at all.

[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 1 points 2 hours ago

You’re welcome, I’ll always be there to not help.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 11 hours ago

There will always be moderation. If you dont ban certain things, people will have to defederate your server or risk being raided by the police. That being said, there are some more lenient servers, but few servers are completely hands off. Your server is not what decides whether your post gets deleted or not however. That is always decided by the mod of the community you post/comment in.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

My instance supports free speech for me :D

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago

Not that I care (as I (IMO) have no really extreme opinions worth censoring) but I think mine is also very hands off as long as it is not illegal like CP.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 9 hours ago

Rn haven't really felt censored by my instance that much. I believe I do hold different opinions to the admins, but that appears to be okay