this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
55 points (95.1% liked)

Games

18209 readers
1011 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Middle-Earth: Shadow of Mordor is remembered for many reasons, but perhaps best of all for its Nemesis system, an incredible mechanic for generating memorable Orc encounters. According to a former executive, the Nemesis system came about from trying to solve a different problem: secondhand sales.

In a new video, Laura Fryer — former vice president of WB Games who oversaw the publisher's Seattle studios at the time — talked about her time with Monolith. While discussing the way trend-chasing affects the industry, Fryer mentioned that chasing trends is what "literally led to the Nemesis system."

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xnx@slrpnk.net 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

No where in the article does it explain what the nemesis system is :(

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 minutes ago

There's a game menu with a diagram of a military hierarchy of named enemies, and their strengths/vulnerabilities. When you find the named enemies in the game and interact with them in some way (iirc it's basically limited to winning/losing a fight or mind controlling them), it affects their traits and their place in the tree, and you'll get a short cutscene where they say stuff referencing your past interactions.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

Well, it is really old news from a game that launched in 2015, but the summary of it is a feature that allows enemies in the game to remember you, and evolve with the player. You killed an Orc chieftain, his right-hand orc is now the chieftain, and thanks you for clearing the way for him. Lost a battle to a miserable orc archer? Next time he sees you he jokes to your face and tells you how shit you are. It is a great system, but it was patented.

[–] eRac@lemmings.world 30 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Summary: They were seeing a disconnect between Arkham Asylum player stats and sales, indicating a large portion of the playerbase blasting through the game then selling it back to retailers. WB studios were directed to explore ways to lengthen player engagement, preferably enough to keep the game forever.

The nemesis system gives some light procedural flair to an otherwise-deaigned experience. I don't think it did what they hoped it would, but it was still a great mechanic.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 30 points 9 hours ago

This sounds to me like the right way to combat secondhand sales. Rather than making the game shitty and/or locking features behind online-only, unlock-keyed connections, they added a content mechanic that was actually fun.

I mean, this is basically the entire premise behind roguelike games, just applied to an action RPG instead (in a small way).

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 61 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yet with the sudden closure of Monolith Productions and cancellation of its Wonder Woman project, that particular success seems doomed to life in the vault. Though the Nemesis system was due to be implemented in the Wonder Woman game, Warner Bros. still owns the patent for the system, which stands with an expiration date in 2036.

The fact that a game mechanic can be patented for over 20 years is fucking insane...

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 38 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Copyright laws have been flawed for at least a century and they've only gotten worse in the last few decades. I (mostly) blame Disney

[–] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Copyright is very different from patent. Almost totally unrelated. Both are fucked up but in completely separate ways.

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Shit, my bad. That's what I get for not going to law school like Mom wanted

[–] nobody158@r.nf 5 points 8 hours ago

The mickey mouse law

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why hasn't someone created another system just like it? Seems like with the massive talent around game creation out there, we need a copycat.

[–] thoughtfuldragon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 10 hours ago (4 children)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 minutes ago

What's the scope on that though? I bet someone could get away with a game that does a somewhat similar thing, just not in the exact same way.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

A game mechanic should not be patentable in this manner. Fucking copyright law.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

I mean you could make a game with it and argue it in court but that's expensive af. That's a bigger part of patenting for the big for corps. Whether it'd stand in court or not is less relevant than scaring people off due to costs.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 7 hours ago

Just don't release the game in the US and Japan.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Now that the studio closed they should license it out.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The patent is owned by WB, not the studio. They won't license it. Just sit on it and let it rot.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But they can earn money from licensing contracts or at least use it themselves

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They haven't bothered doing that in the last 10 years. I don't see them starting now.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 5 hours ago

They only shut down last month, before which they were gonna use it themselves. I've still cope...