this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
86 points (78.3% liked)

Asklemmy

46907 readers
856 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/27293783

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 week ago (2 children)

democrats are simply the 'lesser evil', and have been since the 1960s, at least.. and we've needed a viable third party left of the mainstream for longer.

republican administrations drag us down and undo gains made. democrats repair some of the damage--but never quite enough, never push progress enough. they lose. it gets undone again and the cycle repeats.

but now it's all getting destroyed. there may not be a continuation of the cycle. it's hell from here on until 'trumpism' and maga are what is completely destroyed.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah.

There is always that cycle that includes "Democrats didn't do everything they promised so they deserve to suffer", which brings in Republicans that cause far more damage.

And given the number of election cycles, you would think there would be some organization by now for overall leftist causes, but there isn't. There is no party or organization out there that can pose an electoral threat. The right produced the TEA party, which morphed to MAGA. Leftists have nothing.

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Democrats don't even promise anything anymore. Not since 2008

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

2008 is what ultimately radicalized me. I volunteered for Obama, put in so much footwork, and really believed he would seek to make change. Looking back now, what a fool I was.

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

2006 made me suspicious of the Democrats forever. Pelosi and the party ran on defunding the Iraq War, then promptly dropped it upon taking office.

I DID primary for Obama because he was promising a public healthcare option. We all know how that turned out: he ultimately championed a Republican scheme to entrench private insurers. Democrats failed to support their party's signature policy proposal when it mattered.

While Obama expanded the Bush wars...

That's when I gave up all hope in the party making any progress or acting in good faith. They haven't given me any reason to rethink that stance.

Sorry your efforts and enthusiasm were wasted and abused by the DNC...

I recall the Coffee Party having a moment, a nationwide movement planned meetups all coordinated. In Asheville, I attended. the meetup was crashed by Obama's Organizing for America, and I later learned that they crashed meetups everywhere.

I remember the smooth-talking guy and how he hijacked the meeting as we were making real progress. Fuck Obama and fuck the DNC

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 week ago (9 children)

It's the most anti-communist country on the planet, so there's not much hope. Talk of raising wages or organizing collectively, or not agreeing with US imperialist foreign policy gets you labelled a commie / tankie by its witch-hunting, McCarthyite majority.

If there's a list of countries to next take the communist road, the US would be dead last.

[–] ptc075@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago

"The United States is also a one-party state but, with typical American extravagance, they have two of them."

I attribute the quote wrong all the time, but today the internet says it's from Julius Nyerere, who was a prime minister in Africa back in the 1960s.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Step 1: Don't generalize. Don't say "Americans" when you mean "some Americans". As you can see from browsing here and on other media sites, there are a great many vocal people who have voted Democrat for years but are entirely disappointed by decades of failed DNC leadership.

Step 2: Remind people that everyone is on their own side. Politicians might vote the way you want, or not, but their interests will never be exactly the same as yours. Don't ever believe that the two-party system is an accurate description of our values.

Step 3: Share memes of Schumer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] weeeeum@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cause they aren't, they are just the "better guys".

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago

They're basically "republicans light": still bad but at least not literal nazis

[–] fatur0000new@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is quote from their former member, Huey Long:

"They've got a set of Republican waiters on one side and a set of Democratic waiters on the other side, but no matter which set of waiters brings you the dish, the legislative grub is all prepared in the same Wall Street kitchen"

β€” Huey Long, campaign speech for the re-election of Senator Hattie Caraway (D-AR), 1932 (Williams p. 589)

Source

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago (12 children)

The Deprogram podcast, Hakim, and Second Thought YT channels all exist to address this. It's rather obvious to anybody willing to learn

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] alykanas@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can’t do it . You must just get labelled a Russian bot and banned

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

I'm ready for my ban I guess.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Because the real fight is the rich vs the poor. Even rich democrats.

[–] badbrainstorm@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also this. As NOFX says, Americas for sale, and you can get a good deal on it, and make a healthy profit. Fucking Pelosi and her kind gotta go

[–] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They've had multiple majority governments and you guys still pay an arm and a leg for diabetes medication.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 16 points 1 week ago

Realistically, it's an impossibility. This view is mostly propagated via liberal news sources, having the main battle be conservatism vs progressivism or left vs right (as opposed to class struggle, the poor vs rich, working class vs capitalists), and since the democrats are more progressive than republicans, they're the "good guys" who should be supported.

For it to be destroyed, we'd have to catch up to their level of influence and reach or even surpass it, to show people that they're a party of capitalists who sometimes are progressive, and not an actual ally of the working or middle classes but only pretending to be one. Maybe going one step further too and influencing progressive movements democrats support to pay attention to economic aspects too, given how their root causes aren't purely social?

But again, it's impossible for us workers to have such reach, given how well funded media is.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We don't have to do anything other then work on passing electoral reform one state at a time. Democrats can be whatever the hell they want, so long as everyone is free to vote how they want with the ability to transfer their vote.

Electoral Reform Videos

First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

Videos on alternative electoral systems

STAR voting

Alternative vote

Ranked Choice voting

Range Voting

Single Transferable Vote

Mixed Member Proportional representation

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago (29 children)

Historically, that doesn't actually fix systemic issues, though, like the only parties of relevance electorally being pre-approved and backed by the bourgeoisie. Moreover, electoral reform doesn't have a real path to implementation that would make more sense than revolution to begin with.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

This has never done anything in countries that use it, like SK, Japan, Australia, etc. It might make the candidate stacking a little more expensive, but that's it.

If capital stands above the political system, the method of voting doesn't matter.

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 12 points 1 week ago

Believe you me, I've been trying for years. Tribalism runs too deep in the human condition for there to be any obvious fix.

[–] miguel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

They literally have a donkey (jackass) as mascot.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they haven’t accepted it yet, I’m not sure they want to. The ones holding the lines seem to be just reactionaries pining for a return to the neoliberal status quo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

they're not good guys they are simply more competent at government

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I've seen a lot of similar comments lately. People wanting to start 3rd parties etc, because the Democrats suck so bad.

Yes, it's true. They suck, but if you're going to beat the Republicans, you'll need to look at what Trump did. He didn't start a 3rd party. No, he took the existing party and changed it into whatever the fuck it is now.

You need to change the democratic party from within too, because 3rd parties will always lose because of the first past the post. 3rd parties also have a tendency to branch out, because quite frankly, not being Democrat or Republican isn't enough of a politic in itself, and you guys don't get along well on anything else. The Republicans had this issue for a long time until Trump came along providing them with something that united their voters more than the previous politic of simply being not Democrats.

The democratic party already has a framework for running politics and they actually have some kind of democracy within that allows people to change it. Yeah, it will require a lot of work to get enough people engaged in politics to make the change, but it is absolutely much less than what is required to start a successful 3rd party.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago (8 children)

The difference with the Republican party's changes with Trump and the idea of performing entryism in the Democrats to make it a worker party is that Trump's changes to the GOP are already in line with what the Bourgeoisie wants. The DNC cannot be entered and changed into a working class party because they too get their base from the bourgeoisie.

This is why revolution is necessary to gain real change in favor of the working class.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ycnz@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your problem is that Democrat politicians are also largely rich white dudes, who'd rather be republican than progressive.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί