this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
330 points (99.7% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2623 readers
758 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 140 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

This is the energy Anonymous is supposed to have. I still fondly recall the work they did on Scientology.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

the energy Anonymous is supposed to have

Obligatory "Anonymous is not your personal army," but yeah, this is Anonymous at its best.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The energy that Anonymous as a social construct is supposed to have. I'm not here to give notes to any would-be vigilantes.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

My point was more that the notion that Anonymous is "supposed to have" any particular energy is kinda misunderstanding its nature. It's nice when it does good things, but when that happens it's only because people who did good things decided to label themselves as Anonymous, not because because there's some entity with good intent deciding what Anonymous should do.

[–] AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 45 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

One of the big - but to be expected - problems had always been, that basically every group or individual could don the "Anonymous" label. But yeah, this is in the spirit of the anti-authoritarian hacker identity, that it started out with.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] egrets@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Obligatory "fuck Graham Linehan".

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Absolutely. It's actually kind of ironic considering the episode ”the Internet is coming" actually had one of the better portrayals of a trans person in popular media for some time. Better if they actually cast a trans person for the role. But still.

I would never watch anything new with him attached. Though I don't think that's a worry now. But I'll watch the old stuff for the great cast. Moran and Bailey were fantastic in black books. Probably didn't hurt that Moran had a large hand in writing too. Parkinson, Ayoade, O'dowd, Fielding, and Berry are what made the IT crowd not Linehan. The proof is in the pilot for the version they wanted to foist on us yanks. Even with Ayodae returning, he couldn't make it funny by himself. And that's saying something.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Granted that any time humans wield anonymous power without oversight there will be bad behaviour. When I was younger I took for granted that a key part of the social construct of Anonymous was an ironic awareness of that, hence its suitability for striking back at high-handed enemies of humanity.

I was quite young back then.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

Could they challenge DOGE?

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 26 minutes ago

Remember that time Anonymous fought Scientology? That's why we don't have Scientology anymore.

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Fuck, I wish we heard more about chaotic good hackers like this more often. They're like our modern day super heroes in some regard to me.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 2 points 23 minutes ago

I think they caught most of them from back when they were more active (2009-2012) or at least were more in the public eye.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There is no way this is the same guys who went after Scientology, however, I do love whoever they are. We need more people fighting fascism.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They're based on the AnonOps IRC so it is, technically, the same sect of Anonymous. Although anyone can join and start an Op there so...

https://opdreadnought.com/us

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

Yeah... I'd be real careful getting started by joining a particular irc server known for anything.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 2 points 56 minutes ago

This was YEARS ago. Haven't been on there in over a decade now ;)

[–] toxygen@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

Nice. I love anonymous.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 27 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Twitter is working fine, "blackouts" aren't what they used to be. DDOS attacks aren't really hacking, and would barely interrupt services at the level today's "anonymous" has access to.

People claiming to be anonymous hackers very slightly inconvenience whoever's still on Twitter.

I'm no fan of Musk, but something more powerful needs to be done.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 15 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

Voting. Voting could have been done. I know it sounds trite and overly simplistic, but that's the power We The People have, as set up in the founding of our country. We just have to use it...

How many people sat out in 2024, as everyone politically-engaged screamed that a Trump administration would be bad for the economy, bad for Palestinians, bad for Ukrainians, and bad for America (because it might literally elect a fascist dictator who will enact Project 2025 and refuse to give up their power)? Several thousand? That sounds reasonable, right? Maybe up to hundreds of thousands? Maybe even a million people...? No. 90 million people who were eligible to vote in the presidential election didn't vote by mail, ignored the election drop boxes, and sat at home on Election Day.

That's enough to beat any entrenched political coalition opposed to progress. That's not some "pie in the sky" fantasy, we literally had the numbers to accomplish every single political agenda that actually helps working Americans:

#If "Did Not Vote" was a candidate:

I say this all without an ounce of schadenfreude. I genuinely don't want to hurt the faces of the people who voted for the leopards, not least of all because we all suffer along with them. I will keep shouting this point because we have to do better in the future. Voting isn't always fun, but it's the first and most powerful defense against a wannabe dictator like Trump or Musk. I literally don't care how "not excited" you are about the candidate that doesn't want to tear the US apart, you need to vote, and vote against fascism. That's our only hope going forward...

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 minutes ago

we literally had the numbers to accomplish every single political agenda that actually helps working Americans

Great! Now all you need is a candidate who runs on that.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Billionaires will never allow you to vote away their power.

Never

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 16 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess we should actually try it first before succumbing to defeatism in advance, no? There's a lot more of us than there is of them... What is it people say about the 4 Boxes to be used in defense of Liberty:

  1. soap
  2. ballot
  3. jury
  4. ammo

"Please use in that order."

(That's a quote from Frederick Douglas)

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. We've never actually used our voting privileges. Not really.

Whenever I hear the argument that voting doesn't do anything, I cringe.

When people show up (not just for presidential elections), shit gets done.

But Muricans are lazy and expect others to do the work for them

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 1 points 52 minutes ago

Australia has mandatory voting and the mining industry still owns this country.

Just because America makes it cheap to buy an election doesn't mean it could ever be unaffordable.

[–] jared@mander.xyz 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Did you know mining billionaires is a great way to recover stolen power and resources?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 2 hours ago

Making a note of this for a theoretical speedrun...

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It’s strange how there’s a north/south divide there.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 23 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

Where were these fuckers before the election‽ They did a lot of talk in the lead up to Nov 6th but then nothing came of it

Now they actually want to do something lmao

[–] annette_runner@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They were probably murdered by the CIA or something. Who would know?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 1 points 50 minutes ago

you misspelled suicide

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

where were these fuckers before the election

Shitposting on chan boards, running right wing grifts, spreading QAnon conspiracies…

[–] BJ_and_the_bear@lemm.ee 8 points 3 hours ago

I'm not sure what launching a DDoS would have accomplished... Twitter will be back soon enough

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago

Honestly, even if it isn't doing much, it's making a statement which is more than enough.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Bunch of anons: DDoS Xitter

Elona: Ukraine did it!

Wait before this dimwit will start screaming of casus belli against an unfriendly Ukraine and the USA will start selling Russia weapons.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

Surely they just clicked the 'X' button and it closed itself down?

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 13 points 3 hours ago

Apparently that's what the news is saying

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

Finally, someone is stepping up!

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 12 points 3 hours ago

Wow it's been a little while since I've heard Anonymous taking credit

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Makes me wonder,

Similar to all the peeps 20 years ago in the SETI@home movement, where you could donate your CPU/bandwidth.

Is there any 'safe' way to donate and collectively protest on the internet by signing up to a botnet?

[–] princess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 hours ago

low orbit ion cannon and friends were tools for participating in anon ddos ops back in the day, but it wasn't exactly safe -- without a vpn your isp and other intermediaries can see your traffic, and the host can see your ip address. with a vpn you're in part dosing your vpn, depending on the attack

no idea how anon organizes such things these days

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

The conspiracy crowd believe that Anonymous are a wing of the FBI/CIA. I wonder how they'll reconcile known persons openly attacking another piece of the government. Probably “something something deep state”

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 24 minutes ago
[–] b1t@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

Can confirm. As a former network support "staff" member I was paid by the both the CIA and the FBI. Neither paid very well though.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well, they are attempting to fire a good portion of them. I wouldn't say it's out of the question.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

“Can you believe Ted and the crew are going to federal prison? I can’t believe they signed their names under their many felonies.”

That doesn’t pass a glance test, let alone a sniff test

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

I applaud the blocking of social media as a form of activism and yet peaceful protest.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Where does it say on the website that they are taking credit for the blackout?