this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
517 points (99.8% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2623 readers
1201 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 189 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

This is the energy Anonymous is supposed to have. I still fondly recall the work they did on Scientology.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 27 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

the energy Anonymous is supposed to have

Obligatory "Anonymous is not your personal army," but yeah, this is Anonymous at its best.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The energy that Anonymous as a social construct is supposed to have. I'm not here to give notes to any would-be vigilantes.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

My point was more that the notion that Anonymous is "supposed to have" any particular energy is kinda misunderstanding its nature. It's nice when it does good things, but when that happens it's only because people who did good things decided to label themselves as Anonymous, not because because there's some entity with good intent deciding what Anonymous should do.

[–] AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 64 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

One of the big - but to be expected - problems had always been, that basically every group or individual could don the "Anonymous" label. But yeah, this is in the spirit of the anti-authoritarian hacker identity, that it started out with.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Granted that any time humans wield anonymous power without oversight there will be bad behaviour. When I was younger I took for granted that a key part of the social construct of Anonymous was an ironic awareness of that, hence its suitability for striking back at high-handed enemies of humanity.

I was quite young back then.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] egrets@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Obligatory "fuck Graham Linehan".

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Absolutely. It's actually kind of ironic considering the episode ”the Internet is coming" actually had one of the better portrayals of a trans person in popular media for some time. Better if they actually cast a trans person for the role. But still.

I would never watch anything new with him attached. Though I don't think that's a worry now. But I'll watch the old stuff for the great cast. Moran and Bailey were fantastic in black books. Probably didn't hurt that Moran had a large hand in writing too. Parkinson, Ayoade, O'dowd, Fielding, and Berry are what made the IT crowd not Linehan. The proof is in the pilot for the version they wanted to foist on us yanks. Even with Ayodae returning, he couldn't make it funny by himself. And that's saying something.