They weigh my carry on and complain when it's 1kg over, yet some people weighing twice as much as me get on the plane. Makes no sense.
That weight limit is how much an employee can lift by themselves in America(50 pounds). If it's over they have to team lift.
Sure, for checked luggage. But why does carry on luggage have to be 7kg?
Sometimes the passenger can't lift it for whatever reason, in which case the flight attendants would have to do it.
Then they should put a barbell with weights and you are allowed to bring as many kgs as you can lift with the barbell.
So it's doesn't fall out and crush you in the head during turbulence. It's held up there by a shitty little latch.
Your fellow passenger will be in a seat, not the overhead baggage compartment.
The fellow passenger will be spread across two seats.
Just weigh and charge people with their baggage. Privacy and embarrassment about mass can be blamed on the bag.
"I guess I shouldn't have brought my 50kg tote."
I'm not overweight, I just have really heavy clothes.
This will add a new terror to air travel
From an engineering point of view it makes really good sense because the better you can estimate a plane's weight the better you can maximize efficiency blah blah blah. But these are humans not numbers, and it's a bit rude..
Personally I think it's a bit rude when someone is hanging over into my seat, pressed up against me and forcing me out into the aisle. I'd like to sit in 100% of my seat please.
I put some weight on over the pandemic and I do sympathise that losing weight is quite hard. But fuck if it got to the point I needed 1.5 seats, I'd either do something drastic about it (like the time I had 500 calories a day for a few months and dropped from 15 to 12.5 stone, sorry for the caveman units), or book two seats.
Dude that's a pretty insane diet. Seems pretty dangerous or you were way underestimating your calorie intake.
I will readily acknowledge that it was unsafe (I don't think it's a coincidence that's when my heriditary hair loss kicked in). I was taking a vitamin supplement and using myFitnessPal to track calories, some days I only had 300 calories but most days I had 500-600.
For me, gradual weight loss seemed unattainable. I kept trying and failing. So I just said fuck it I'm going to do something drastic to lose the weight. Of course, having willpower and losing the weight gradually is the best way to do it.
Nothing more to add. They can buy two seats.
I had a woman the other day doing this. She was determined to type on her laptop despite not just her body but her elbows / arms breaching my side. After about an hour of this I got fed up, seized the moment as she got something from her bag to actually sit back in my seat for the first time. She did not like this and proceeded to stubbornly type like a t-rex with her elbow either in my guts or smashed into the crook of my arm.
Not sure what's difficult to understand for someone like that; if what they want to do involves spreading out into someone elses seat, then they have to pause the task.
Planes have a maximum weight, and it really matters where exactly in the plan that weight is. Even if it was rude, which it isn't, it can be an important safety concern
If it's rude they can buy 2 tickets for their fat ass and skip the requirements to be weighed
Humans not able to battle climate change, because they can't admit their weight.
I'm comfortable in my weight. However, my girlfriend is not. We won't be flying any airline that weighs us. That would be a small crisis for her.
That would be a small crisis for her.
Hah!
Shit - that wasn't meant to be a pun
You have your whole luaggage scanned, body scans, fingerprints, passport and even custom officers asking you where you stay and god knows what background checks are going on, but weight is gonna be an issue ?
Where she is right now mentally, it's best for her to not have a number put to what she weighs.
Fair, it doesnt change the reality tho, its just a number whatever that number may look like.
I dont agree with that proposed practice either, in fact i would be more happy if we wouldnt have to go through most of the "safety" procedures they put in place, but its not going to change my choice of airlines because i book whatever is convinient and affordable.
It's a slippery slope. Soon they'll have two separate queues, and one of them will be called "fatties".
It's a slope I'm willing to slide down.
Until you get stuck on the sides, yeah
Make them walk through a narrow gate to see how many seats they need to buy.
And this is how humans evolved to have whiskers.
I welcome it. I'm harassed for the 1kg excess in my bag. If you're not charging others more, I'd like not to be treated like that. Give me a discount then for every kilogram I weigh less by.
Do you seriously think it would work that way? They wouldn't charge you a single cent less. Probably charge others more though.
I think what they mean is that if their neighbor is allowed to weight 120kg with 8kg of carry-on and they weight 85kg, they might as well be allowed heavier carry-on. Doesn't have to be one on one, and of course the carry-on weight limit is also done for a few other reasons, but that seems to be the idea.
To be fair: Carry-on that is weighty is a safety risk. So is me in a window seat with a person that can barely fit into a single seat in the two seats aisle-side from me.
On September 16, it became evident that airlines were becoming more interested in passengers’ weight. Prominent carriers like Korean Air and Air New Zealand introduced a rather unconventional rule, requiring passengers to step on scales before boarding their flights. [...] This novel approach in the aviation industry has gained momentum, with the objective of maintaining optimal aircraft weight and thereby reducing fuel consumption. The primary goal of this unconventional procedure is to precisely determine the standard weight of passengers and averages. This, in turn, aids in accurately calculating the distribution of weight on the aircraft, resulting in fuel savings. [...] The ultimate objective is to ensure that each flight adheres to strict parameters set by the maximum take-off weight of the aircraft, thereby enhancing safety. However, for many, this emphasis on safety might feel like an intrusion into their privacy.
I didn't know that this was a factor that they needed to consider. The privacy aspect is real, and we need regulations on storage and deletion of this data after each flight. I can already see this info being sold to advertisers.
On the discomfort side, couldn't they have the collection and recording happen in the background? If no other passengers or staff can see the numbers, there's less of a chance of someone feeling uncomfortable with the process.
This is all assuming that this is actually necessary or helpful.
On the discomfort side, couldn’t they have the collection and recording happen in the background? If no other passengers or staff can see the numbers, there’s less of a chance of someone feeling uncomfortable with the process.
The weighing process involves humans, so that wouldn't be possible.
Their average intelligence being what it is, when instructed to have one person on the scale, sometimes it's one, sometimes two, sometimes two and a stroller. Sometimes somehow a horse ends up on the scale and no one really understands how, including that horse.
Unless you check the weight, you don't know what exactly was weighed.
They're not weighing every passenger forever. They just want to get reliable stats on the average per passenger.
The article states that the information will be kept private.
I mean they do need to balance the plane so it makes sense, another thing they could do is eliminate first class seats and spread the seating out a little more so they can relocate passengers easier.
This isn't new in the airline world.
I believe there is a Tongan airline that has been doing it for a few years already
That is so racist against Americans, lol
This doesn't sound like they're charging extra if you're over a certain weight, which is what a lot of people here seem to be assuming. Its data collection for future designs.
People are aware that you get charged for overweight baggage for health and safety reasons, right? Anything over about 20 kilos is too heavy for a single person to safely handle so they have to get two people to do it, which costs more time and money. I would be very genuinely surprised if a few dozen more kilos from overweight baggage and people would be enough to seriously impact a plane's flight unless you're on a small town hopper
I'm not ok with it but I think airlines should make bigger seats available. make it an option to book these chairs , no weighting needed, but I rather pay for a bigger seat than book 2 seats and the 2 seats not honoured when boarding the plane.
The reason for the weight check is to balance out the plane to save kerosene.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/