this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
120 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

61227 readers
4927 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 35 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I kinda love the idea of IPhone users getting reamed, of course that doesn't make this acceptable at all.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It’s an industry fact that iPhone users are more willing to pay for stuff.

It works in mobile games too, Android users just don’t spend. They can be tracked better because Google DGAF, but iPhone users rake in the cash.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I have an old iPad that I gave to my daughter and it's disgusting how each app is subscription blocked.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You’re going to pay either way. Subscription (iOS) or scummy ads all over (Android)

I’d rather pay than subject my kids to random predatory ads.

One time payment would be best of course, but it’s not a viable business model in most cases

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Or just use an adblocker...

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And then the kid complains that they can’t watch ads to get diamonds.

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 6 days ago

They can be tracked better because Google DGAF, but iPhone users rake in the cash.

Deny the parasites profit and engagement.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Lol. I Iove that people think apple isn't collecting just as much of their data as Google. It's a stupid assumption and it's not true but here we are.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I work in mobile games.

You should’ve seen the fits the Marketing department threw when Apple removed tracking (IDFA). It made conversion tracking almost impossible and thus worthless.

There is a difference. A clear difference.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This was a comment about Apple and Google specifically, not about their app stores or the apps on them created by non-apple/non-google developers. There's a clear difference.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Google allows data collection, they need it because they’re an ad company.

Apple will make their products shitty rather than spy on their users. Their profits come from hardware and software sales. Their ad revenue is a rounding error

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 2 points 6 days ago

They do still collect an awful lot of data, though, there's been research on that - even if less than Android, I'd consider them similar in this regard.

[–] Bane@feddit.kyiv.ua 21 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

There is no bottom in how depraved capitalism will go to extract value and maximise profits... any company that takes the moral high-ground is at disadvantage because morality/ethics are expensive, and crime pays.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)
[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

You win the internet today 🥇

This is the most horrifying, bloodlust-inducing, depressing and dreadfully dystopian thing I've read this morning and I've already scrolled for 20 minutes! 10/10 ⭐⭐⭐⭐

[–] prex@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago

Careful, they'll do emojis next.

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ah, calm down, that's just some marketing speak bullshit some startups use to scam bigger corpos out of money.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

I mean yeah but the concept if done even remotely correctly is still terrifying? If I tell you I am going to kill you with a laser gun, just because I might be lying about the laser part doesn't mean it's not concerning.

According to new lending startups, your social media activity and how low you let your phone battery get can be read as signs of creditworthiness, making loans available to those who may not have qualified otherwise

Yet the article discusses none of this. Just vague "data points".

This sounds like discrimination based on "algorithms" but one that is legal.

[–] Bane@feddit.kyiv.ua 1 points 6 days ago

Whaaaat?! I thought the only consequnce of having low battery life on your phone was people telling you to charge it!

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We need an open source uber

[–] finley@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That pays a fair and living wage

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

Is it doable?

[–] xep@fedia.io 6 points 6 days ago

I think it's true that owners of Apple products are more affluent so if I were to put on my evil capitalist hat and could collect this point of data, I would certainly at least test differential pricing just to see if it works.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 6 days ago

U don't see why we won't file out tax returns and monthly bank statements so so daddy parasite knows exactly how much he can take!

These parasites are despicable and we dove head first in a this tech, now we are getting thoroughly destroyed for this mistake.