It's pretty incredible how out of step Alito and Thomas seem to be even with the other conservative justices. Anytime there's a 7-2 or 8-1 ruling you can almost guarantee they'll be writing the dissent.
World News
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
It$ almo$t like there$ a rea$on for that.
It's not bad to write a decent, it's literally just the other side of the argument. It's not like the justices sequester from each other and then wait until ruling day to reveal their thoughts to each other.
I'm not saying I like the guy. I'm saying that it makes sense to write down the other side of the ruling for future reference.
I’m not saying I like the guy. I’m saying that it makes sense to write down the other side of the ruling for future reference.
this implies they're playing devil's advocate but uh, that's very much not what they're doing when they're in dissent. Alito and Thomas quite sincerely believe what they write--or at least do so enough to want them to be binding law.
Based on the allegations against the two of them I doubt they have firm beliefs on much of anything besides how their position can benefit them personally.