World News

22057 readers

52 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Supreme Court says states can’t overrule Biden on whom to deport (thehill.com)

submitted 1 year ago by ffmike@beehaw.org to c/news@beehaw.org

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Another bullshit legal theory from Texas goes down in flames. Justice Alito dissented because of course he did.

[Image description: Migrants wait in line adjacent to the border fence under the watch of the Texas National Guard to enter into El Paso, Texas, Wednesday, May 10, 2023.]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not bad to write a decent, it's literally just the other side of the argument. It's not like the justices sequester from each other and then wait until ruling day to reveal their thoughts to each other.

I'm not saying I like the guy. I'm saying that it makes sense to write down the other side of the ruling for future reference.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not saying I like the guy. I’m saying that it makes sense to write down the other side of the ruling for future reference.

this implies they're playing devil's advocate but uh, that's very much not what they're doing when they're in dissent. Alito and Thomas quite sincerely believe what they write--or at least do so enough to want them to be binding law.

[–] SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Based on the allegations against the two of them I doubt they have firm beliefs on much of anything besides how their position can benefit them personally.