this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
77 points (95.3% liked)

Apple

17628 readers
368 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Is it worth paying 6€ for ?

I recently got an iPad, it's the first Apple device I've use. I am still not over the fact that I need to pay for a thing as basic as an ad-blocker, and that it will only work with Safari...

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I use AdGuard and Vinegar Extract (Vinegar without the adblock part). IIRC those are free and work well for me, so try them first.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

I even paid for the pro version. They deserve it!

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Second Vinegar. It’s an awesome little add-on.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I’d say so. I haven’t upgraded to Wipr 2, yet, but Wipr 1 is effective and simple. AdGuard has a free version that is good but, for whatever reason, involves a lot more settings changes. AdGuard has the advantage of letting you select elements and block them. Wipr doesn’t, don’t know if Wipr 2 has that.

If you want free, try AdGuard or Firefox Focus.

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There’s wBlock if you can’t justify the cost. I just prefer supporting indie devs. Not sure how effective it is against YouTube ads though.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Welcome to the Apple world

[–] nicerdicer@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

There are a lot of options to block ads. I don’t pay for any apps and don’t see any ads on my Apple devices.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ve been using AdGuard for years, and I don’t ever have any problems with YouTube ads.

And it’s free

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Are you able to block YT ads on Safari + AdGuard? That’s the combo I have, and it did work for a while, but nowadays, all YT videos stop at the 1 min mark. Seems like YT is beginning to block people who use ad blockers.

[–] Paul_Harts@mastodon.nl 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@Hamartiogonic @EleventhHour I know this sounds oldfashioned but I pay for YouTube premium. Not cheap, comes with four additional members. The YouTube Music categorisation is 100 times better than the Apple Music categorisation and indeed: no adds.

I’m not by principle against ad blockers but the money has to come from somewhere.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, that’s an entirely valid option. However, 15 €/month is a bit difficult to justify, given the quality I would get in return. The family plan might make more sense though.

[–] Paul_Harts@mastodon.nl 1 points 1 week ago

@Hamartiogonic without family members I wouldn’t do it, indeed. Side note; it’s very difficult to get it working properly on the computers of the family members.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your continued and persistent, psychotic delusion isn’t my problem. Stop replying and making it my problem

Otherwise, I’m just gonna keep putting out your psychotic decisions.

Reply to this comment for more and the most insulting things you can hear. It will continue until you just shut the fuck up and stop replying.

Obviously, you don’t have that level of self-control, so I’m just going to have to give you horribly disgusting insults forever.

Unless you just stop. Otherwise it’ll go on forever.

I’ve pity your mental illusion. But not so much that I won’t infinitely shame you for it.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oooh, free insults. Yes please.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You aren’t important enough to bother with.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

You are appreciated the way you are. Here, have some flowers to cheer you up 💐🌸🌻

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s very sad that brain is diarrhea. Best of luck.

Blocked

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This level of toxicity is really impressive. Can I get sone sarin sauce on that plutonium burger, please?

[–] Link@rentadrunk.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you check their comment history you can see that they seem to do this frequently with no real reason from what I can tell.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Oh, I’ve read lots of those comments. Truly fascinating stuff, and I think there is a reason. Here are some guesses.

  1. That user is suffering from some sort of mental issues. This seems like the obvious option, but I don’t think it’s the most likely one.
  2. It’s a social experiment. Someone is using it to gather information on how people respond to hostility online. I would love to carry out an experiment like that, but can’t justify the negativity that would be inherently involved in it. I’m really curious to find out how different instances, communities or even other social medias respond. Are some places more hostile or mature than others? What does it take to get your messages deleted or account banned? Who knows.
  3. It’s a piece of online art. That account is used for making a statement about online debates, hostility and the ways people react.
  4. It’s a personal goal. Who has the most downvoted account on Lemmy? That’s an achievement of sorts, I guess. This is the kind of stuff people do when they’ve already completed the main quest and most of the side quests.
  5. Plain old trolling. Sort of like point 4, but for entertainment purposes instead of questionable bragging rights.
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m unfamiliar with Wipr is it worth $6 for the new one or just pay $2 for the original?

[–] nicerdicer@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I use KaBlock and Hush Nag Blocker. Both apps are availiable for macOS as well as for iOS. They are made to work with Safari. So far I haven't had any issues with ads, even when watching Youtube videos. They are free. I would give them a try first. If they don't work for you, you always can purchase wipr later.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Which one do you like better? I try not to overload my phone content blockers because it’s hard to troubleshoot if a site breaks. I see Hush Nag claims they are FOSS so I’m leaning towards it.

[–] nicerdicer@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

I discovered KaBlock first, and it did its job. I did not test it with Youtube tho. A couple of weeks ago someone mentioned Hush Nag Blocker and I installed it as well. I think they complete each other, as Hush makes Cookie-Banners disappear, which KaBlock doesn't. Both KaBlock and Hush seem to block ads from Youtube - I haven't experienced ads on smartphone so far (I skipped into maybe 3 to 5 videos on it in the last couple of weeks, as I have a data plan that isn't tailored for video streaming).

[–] 3aqn5k6ryk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why cant the dev just update the original wipr? Why the need for wipr 2?

I bought the original wipr years ago. Havent used it in favor of adguard.

[–] Prontomomo@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because app developers can’t support themselves with a $5 app that people use for half a dozen years.

Skip buying one drink or appetizer and pay for an app to support people who make great things.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Appies are like $13 where I am. A beer, $7-9.

This is a steal!

[–] 1984@lemmy.today -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Newtube is all you need

Edit : Oh apple. Never mind.

[–] DavidGA@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Paying for a YouTube ad blocker instead of just paying for YouTube Premium seems a little silly.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

YouTube premium just went up to like $80/month didn’t it? Seems a bit more than $5.

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, you’re thinking of YouTube TV. Different service.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Gotcha, I thought they were the same service.