this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
155 points (87.1% liked)

World News

39356 readers
3579 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you get a divorce in North Korea, you and your spouse will be sent to a labor camp for one to six months to atone for your “crimes,” residents in the country told Radio Free Asia.

Divorce is considered an anti-socialist act, and is generally frowned upon in Korea.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WeUnite@lemm.ee 0 points 6 hours ago

If Project 2025 becomes a reality we might start seeing headlines which say "In the United States, couples who divorce will be sent to labor camps".

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

"Please don't tell me we got assigned to the same camp, damn!"

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You have to like really fuckin hate each other to still get a divorce.

Could be the start of the plot for a romantic comedy brought to you by NK's propaganda films department. Divorcing couple sign the papers, get carted off to a labor camp and learn to love the state -- and each other (but mostly the state) -- all over again.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

These people have different problems all together. Do you think they want self actualize,find themselves or some shit? Lol 😂 divorce

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 2 points 18 hours ago

Did you even read the post?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Coming soon to a Republican house bill near you...

[–] BenM2023@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But only if its the woman who wants the divorce.... And then only if the man's income is above $1000000 otherwise they are poor and therefore should be in a labour camp/work for Amazon anyway. If they are same sex they go to the camp anyway.

Not sure if /s is appropriate cos I am a "right ponder" and don't know how close to the truth I am...

[–] philpo@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, or they make a fine rule "For 100.000$ you can buy you out of the camp or send an immigrant to take your place."

Because of course Trump, his cronies and all these idiots still want the option to get rid of their (35+) "aging" wife's and make sure the 20 year old they bought cannot run away that fast.

I fully expect a "you cannot leave the country without your husband's approval" app like in Saudi Arabia at some point.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

North Korea is too pro-woman’s rights for Republicans

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"Divorce is considered an anti-socialist act"

I don't even understand what this means.

I feel like it's like saying "eating pineapple pizza is generally an anti-banking act."

...what?

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think the logic is that a low birth rate is bad for the state. To harm the state makes one an anti-socialist.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does divorce by itself even lower the birthrate though? Intuitively, one might suspect that a couple that were no longer interested in eachother probably isn't having many children, compared to if those people were to pair off again with new partners?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, I feel like promoting healthcare for pregnant people and children, giving incentives to having kids and pushing out propaganda pertaining to sex without condoms feeling better and pregnant women being sexy is all the rage while using movies, tv, and music to push promiscuity would help birth rates.

"Had a hard day... Take it out on a hard cock." Haha things I never thought I'd type in my life for 200 Alex

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 6 points 1 day ago

The cannon fodder isn't going to make itself

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm a firm-believer that if people do not want to understand something, then they won't.

It doesn't take much thought to realize they're referring to the unity of the nation. Divorces cause problems. They show not everything is hunky-dory. The regime doesn't want that.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Divorces solve problems. That's what they are for. What they cause is a glitch in the mirage, you think? Probably, but it might be something more idiotic even.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

North Korea is all about appearances, actual solutions aren't important

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

Well since we're sharing firm beliefs, I firmly believe if your intent is to inform someone then insulting the person you're supposedly informing is the worst way to go about it. People just get defensive and will attempt to reject information more readily when that is done.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 4 points 2 days ago

Now that they found a business selling mercenaries they need to increase the birth rate

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 18 points 2 days ago

So, they allow divorce, but that comes bundled with a near death sentence for both?

Wasn't easier to just forbid divorces? I'm guessing the elite needs divorces for when they find a hotter girl.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

Get a divorce? Straight to jail. No question.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The most "reliable" source possible

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Isn’t the whole North Korea just a big labor camp?

[–] MaDMaX99@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol, we all know the organisation running radio free Asia to spread its propaganda… lol 😂😂😂

[–] john89@lemmy.ca -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't this source funded by the CIA?

[–] TruckFonaldDump@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, it's funded by Congress, but that hardly means anything.

You need to go learn what editorial independence is. Journalists for RFA aren't being sentenced to 3 generations of there family being out into concentration camps for disagreeing with the US govt.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Journalists for RFA aren't being sentenced to 3 generations of there family being out into concentration camps for disagreeing with the US govt.

Careful. If Trump could read, he'd think that was a brilliant idea.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why is congress funding it?

[–] TruckFonaldDump@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

I mean it's pretty much our version of the BBC.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Congress holds the checkbook. Nothing any part of the federal government does is funded by anyone unless they write the metaphorical check.

News about the world is important to have without it coming from private money, just as news from private money is important to have so it isn't all coming from the governments money.

Other instances of money being used in this way is PBS. So, Mr. Rogers, Reading Rainbow, Sesame Street, Arthur, The Magic School Bus, Wishbone... all aired on TV for the American populous because Congress wrote a check.