this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
872 points (91.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27156 readers
3106 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Had to put on pants to go outside due to artificially created laws.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I dunno I kind of hate sitting where someone else's sweaty ass has sat on first. I'll let this one slide.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

But you take them off when you kiss a mirror on the lips

[–] _____@lemm.ee 128 points 4 days ago (4 children)

NDT the goat of saying rly dumb shit but everyone thinks it's somehow enlightening. he's like Jaden smith but Twitter likes him

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 86 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I mean I agree with him here. It's ridiculous how we are still this tribalistic species while basically everyone would be better off when we would work together (e.g. climate change would be non-existent)

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Passports weren't a general concept until the end of the 19th century. Before they were mostly to allow passage to certain areas inside one country, rather than for movement between countries. There have been Identifications for Nobels and Diplomats though.

Anyways the whole concept is mostly a concept of modern nation states not of ancient tribalism.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (8 children)

I think the point is that the tribalism led to the creation of the nations/states in the first place. I don't know enough to know if that's true, but that was my interpretation of their comment.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but... did you know, if you kiss a mirror you will always kiss yourself on the lips. How's that?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago (9 children)

I don't care if you hate him; he's right on this. this entire thing is bullshit.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Hoimo@ani.social 87 points 5 days ago (4 children)
[–] el_doso@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago

We live in a patchwork of societies, I think is the thing

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 61 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Wait til you learn that the reason you hate immigrants and immigration is that the wealthy conditioned you to hate them. Notice how capital can cross borders, but people can't? This allows the wealthy to profit off of international arbitrage, while regular citizens can't. A CEO can move a factory to a low cost country to save on labor, but you in a wealthy country can't move there to save on cost of living. And the citizens in a poor country can't move to a wealthy country to earn better wages. The corporations get to take advantage of international arbitrage, but you don't.

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Corporations are people except when they're conveniently not!

[–] Juice@midwest.social 12 points 4 days ago

This is clearly a completely natural phenomenon, like the weather !

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (20 children)

I love all the posts calling him arrogant and elitist for pointing out something, in a critical manner, that by their nature are arrogant and elitist: nation state borders.

Those things that make people who've done nothing feel entitled to more resources than other people by virtue of where their mother was hanging out when she popped them out.

I think dwelling on their artifical, self-serving nature is healthier than taking them seriously in any other sense than the threat of state violence for failing to pretend that they're sacred.

Humanity, not to be confused with your own individual greed or birth lottery results, would be far better off abolishing them. They bring nothing to the table but dehumanization, death, and inequity. Most, even most who consider themselves to be on the privileged side of the imaginary line in the dirt, have far more in common with the people trying to get to the privileged side than the miniscule populations of sociopath humans that use them to secure and metastasize their ego score hoards, the entire point of them.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] halowpeano@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think it actually is interesting if you're going to call out humans as a species of animal!

All across species from unicellular to megafauna, from plants to fungus, you can find mechanisms used to defend an individual's physical territory. Ants and bees from the same species will fight and kill others colony members of they stray into their territory. Bears will fight and kill other bears. Our closest relatives, chimps, will go to war with neighboring chimp bands.

Artificial borders are humans way of saying "this is my territory enter at your own risk". The REALLY interesting thing is that we have established systematic exceptions to the behaviors we see in nature. "Ask us before you come and you can visit and be safe here from those that enforce our territory."

The temporary nature is unique, many social animals will permanently adopt an outsider into their group on occasion, equivalent to immigration, but I'm not aware of any that have pre-agreed temporary violations of group territory.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I guess you can draw that comparison, but then human territories are exponentially bigger than anything an equivalent social animal might claim as "enter at your risk" area. A traveling pack of dogs can just go around another pack's territory. We can't do that, we're boxed in. There's no neutral space left. I guess you could argue there's international waters, but that's practically inaccessible to most people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's crazy to think that the level of border control we have today would be unfathomable to someone even 100 years ago. If we go a bit earlier, how could you even ID someone without photographs?

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People could tell which village you came from just by your accent, strangers would easily stand out

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago

Sure, but go to a city and you're just another import. Go to another country, and you're just "the foreigner". Through almost all of human history, you could just kinda leave your past behind if you just ran away

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This is a call for world federalism. I support it, but it's probably ahead of our time. A democratic world federation (a truly united nations [of earth] perhaps) would be able to more effectively solve many (global) problems.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or it's a return to how things were before nationalism rotted the brains of basically everyone on Earth

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 44 points 5 days ago (9 children)

This dude really is a pompous ass sometimes.

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Agreed he can be pompous but I think since he's an astronomer he is making the point that if you were in space and looked at earth you would wonder why are there borders

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 43 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Because it turns out sociology, anthropology and politics also exist.

If you were in space and looked at Earth you wouldn't see any people.

EDIT: Crap, someone is going to point out that you can see lights at night, aren't they? This thread is for pedants and now I've started a conversation about biomarkers you can see from orbit.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Blackout@fedia.io 38 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Only plebs wait in line. I put my request in an envelope, a government servant picks it up at my door and takes it to more government servants who do all the work before hand delivering it back.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Black science man always talks like he's done weed for the first time and is trying to impress his nephew's friends.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (9 children)

I think about this a few times a year and I become sad each time. We only get this one planet in the whole ass universe. And we can barely see all of it, unless we're lucky and/or rich (at least moreso than most of humankind).

It's profoundly ridiculous.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes borders are bullshit, but he really doesn't have to come across all high and mighty about it

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 43 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I'm not convinced that he knows how to come across in any other way

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Txmyx@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Join Schengen! It's easy, unless Austria abuses it's Veto rights

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saithe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago

He somehow managed to make border abolition sound uncool. Many people don’t agree with it for many reasons, none of which were it being uncool until this tweet

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hits the joint "borders man"

This is not interesting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uzay@infosec.pub 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

PSA: If all you have to do is wait in line, you're privileged af

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 days ago

β€œ β€˜Private property is the smallest unit of warfare’ - The Environmental Rescue Team Handbook”

β€” Annalee Newitz, The Terraformers (2023), chapter 15

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Sure, as soon as we all agree on what form of government to have and what actions it should take, or at least the point at which we are all willing to not take up arms in opposition against it, we can get rid of these artificially conceived borders.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί