this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
101 points (95.5% liked)

World News

39356 readers
2340 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Uyghur militant group Turkistan Islamic Party (TIP), which played a role in toppling Syria’s Assad regime, has vowed to take its fight to China.

In a propaganda video, TIP fighters declared their mission to “liberate East Turkistan” from Chinese control, referencing cities in Xinjiang.

TIP has been active in Syria for over a decade, aligned with Islamist group HTS.

While their capabilities remain unclear, TIP’s rhetoric signals potential threats to China’s global assets. Beijing may push for their extradition, raising challenges for Syria’s new government and regional stability.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ramsorge@discuss.online 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, we know the ML and hexbears are against this.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I literally saw this as a hexbear thread first. Somehow this is America doing this, and the only possible reason they could have is that America put them up to it, and as a result China needs to be more aggressive because they're too passive and kind right now.

[–] ramsorge@discuss.online 10 points 1 week ago

Hehe. That’s the spin they would use.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You're gonna need more support from people in China.

Syrian rebels has the advantage of the people supporting the overthrow of Assad, there's no widespread dissatisfaction with Xi, separatist movements would just get crushed (unless you had foreign intervention ahem USA Support), you need can't just secede and get your freedom, you have to literally overthow Xi and the central government in Beijing, doesn't seem that likely to me. Xi also has nukes which Assad didn't.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not the only way for them to win. They can also just take over a territory and perform gorilla warfare that costs China so much that they have to just give up. Is that likely to succeed? Probably not. It's a lot more likely than trying to overthrow the entire Chinese government though.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I heard Ukraine has some new ways to fight wars. What was it? Stapping a bomb to a drone then colliding with stuff. Sure DJI can spare a few for the Chinese military.

Why even send soldiers when they'll just do drone bombings everyday till the rebels give up. Its not like China have to invade like russia had to, they already control the area, they only need to hold it, defence is much easier to do. Unlike Syria, China has much more resources, its one of the world largest economy. I think they have a way of crushing dissent. The only way the rebels can have a chance of winnning is if the US is willing to intervene. So that's the question, does the US have the will to go up against China? Think about all the stuff that the US still manufacture in China. All the electronics, etc... I don't think the US will go that far, not yet.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not really how a gorilla war is won. You don't just have targets sitting around to strike. You hit their supply lines and just cause mayham, and get the fuck out before they can hit back. You hide within civilians so your troops can't be found. You force the enemy in over-retaliation, which causes them to create more enemies and commit more resources to strike.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

You hide within civilians so your troops can’t be found.

CCP literally just racial profiled them and put them in camps for "re-education". Many of those separatists, along with many innocents that aren't involved in the separatist movement, are already in those camps being "re-educated" (aka: brainwashed). According to some people that have been in the Xinjiang/Tibet regions, there are soldiers everywhere with checkpoints, and thee soldiers often go through the phones of anyone who pass the checkpoint. And cameras are everywhere. Not exactly easy for guerrilla warfare. A mere suspicion of being a separatist can have you end up in a camp.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

The Syrian way of doing this was putting you into torture prison if they didnt like you at the checkpoint. The Israeli way of having a dozen checkpoints a mile and total surveillance still fails to prevent people from resisting the occupation in the Westbank

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

For sure it will be difficult with such an authoritarian state. I'm not arguing that. I'm just saying it wouldn't be the same type of war as Ukraine.

[–] StraponStratos@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Alternatively if China gets involved in Taiwan, it would also be one of the best times to try to secede.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Difference being, Chinese military isn't as pathetic as the russian's

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well… that’s not clear. And if they invaded Taiwan - an action that would cause catastrophic economic effects in basically every single major country in the world, because part of Taiwan’s final defense strategy is “we will melt our chip foundries to slag before we let the PRC have them” - they’ll make a staunch enemy of nearly EVERYONE. It wouldn’t be a case of “military aid”. It would be a case of “almost everyone helps Taiwan defend themselves from China”.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not just Taiwan, the US would stink the island before China could seize intact chip labs.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Again, they wouldn’t need to. Taiwan has openly stated that wrecking their own advanced industry such that it can’t be co-opted is a specific point of their strategic defense plans vis a vis the PRC.

[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The problem with the Chinese military is that they have not participated in recent conflicts.

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Syria is quite a long ways from China. Makes me wonder how serious they are. Then again, such operations aren't a foreign concept in the middle east, so what do I know?

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago