this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
104 points (93.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36154 readers
1223 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Asking for a friend

Edit: wording

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

Water the tree of liberty with the blood of the tyrant

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If your friend is willing to make the effort to combat this, she should get organized. She should find like-minded people, act locally to gain political power, and create a stronghold where the illegitimate government will face resistance. She should base this around ideological lines, rather than willingly subscribing to what experienced members in established political elites in her country are trying to make her say or do. She should write down whether values are and make sure to keep them close at all times, knowing that she just might be successful and that power corrupts.

She should not give up hope, but she should give up the belief that others will change anything for her. She needs recognize that her country is already broken, and she needs to act to be the change.

She needs to recognize that she's not powerless. She can make a difference.

Likewise, she needs to recognize that it's a long and painful process. It needs to start locally, and it might always stay local. But that is fine.

She needs to realize strength is in the community. Building the community of like minded people working for local action is crucial. She'll be disappointed in them at times, but she'll just have to keep going. There's power in community.

At least that's what I think I'd advice her. But I don't know your friend or her situation, obviously.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

She says she grateful for your thoughtful response and did not intend to be rude but asked if you had any examples of this working. I told her that would be rude because you're a very kind thoughtful person so don't mind her.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

She'll be happy to hear that it has worked on numerous occasions throughout history! After the fall of Fascism in Europe, people in many countries got together and created strong welfare states in the post war period. Some were more successful than others, but even in the ultraconservative UK they managed to create a national health service that hs proven difficult to kill off.

Sadly, I'll have to break to her that the fight never ends. The second you stop fighting for progress, some asshole will pop up and try to instill feudalism again. After a generation or two people tend to forget the ongoing nature of this threat, and it seems we haven't managed to come up with ways to permanently get rid of it, despite our best efforts following the French and American revolutions.

Maybe the time has come to go back to the drawing board, and rethink some of the decisions that were made back then. Jefferson said every generation should have its own constitution. Maybe he was right.

[–] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It has worked after a violent struggle forced the system to change or gave opportunities for previously oppressed voices to come into power.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, generally people need quite a bit of nudging before they get off their asses.

So now seems like a good time to start - no reason to wait for things to get even worse. This is why I stress the community building - it only really requires people to fight back, but it does require people to fight back.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

are you guys getting a divorce

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We just want you to be happy and every thing right now is really taking a toll

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

Yes: all modern democracies.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

The Underground Railroad comes to mind.

!Resist@fedia.io

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 13 points 1 week ago

First all, glad your friend recognized this.

I found this article to be a prescient good grounding: https://wagingnonviolence.org/2024/11/10-things-to-do-if-trump-wins/

I'm finding local communities to participate in (potlucks, picnics, movie night, anything that doesn't spend more money). Sending holiday cards to my neighbors, anything to connect and integrate because what comes next will test all our bonds.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

With combat.

News at 11.

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

A lot of the initial popularity of Isis in Iraq was due to very similar factors. This was an uprising of a complex mix of people and goals. Most involved at first were established leaders who were patriotic and tribes who were oppressed by the new and invalid government.

This of course was airbrushed in the west and countless thousands were killed by Americans during the uprising.

Syria was destabilized due to the mass death.

The main takeaway here is that force often seems like an answer but that can go badly

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"and the only thing that would expidite its destruction is a violent revolution". feels like sorta a leading question to me.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, kind of incorrect too. I should edit it, "to say and violent revolution would only expedite it's destruction."

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ok so the bias is away from violence rather than toward it?

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not as effective as weaponized competence but use what ya got

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assuming we’re thinking of the same place, you have to deal with a large group of people who have been fooled, and are about to get very angry and need a target they can reach for their anger. Highlighting mid to high level members of their party leadership as the people to blame allows them to hold their great leader blameless, protecting their egos, while at the same time ripping down the pillars that prop up that same leader. Calling for new blood to support… whatever leader you’re talking about, and voting out “those idiots that aren’t giving him what he needs and so we all are suffering” allows the malleable followers to self destruct the party apparatus like ants eating away the bones of an elephant.

[–] chillinit@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 week ago

Manipulation in revolution is how we get a dictatorship.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago
[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do you believe said government is worth saving? Is it particularly robust or advanced in some way? If it's the country that I'm assuming, your government is currently functioning exactly as it was designed, and the incoming administration is not the coup you seem to think it is.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe it's not worth saving but I don't think it should be dismantled too the advantage of an adversary.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The adversary gets a much, much more significant advantage from holding your government captive and using it to further their interests. If they wanted to simply remove it from play, their angle of attack would differ.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Their angle of attack is the only angle. If they ever had full control they would no longer be an adversary. Destroying the government holding them back would be to their every advantage and is their end goal.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The goal of the hostile country is to cause chaos and conflict. It does not care if an insider or outsider does it.

The only way to win is not to play.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You say that as if it's an option for everyone in said country.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As long as you're alive, you have options. And the majority of them are usually better than just giving up and dying, either by a civil war or under the occupation forces.

The only thing not clear is the timing. How close is the shit from the fan at any particular moment?

[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So are you advocating for action or "not playing" (ie rolling over)? Make up your mind.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Personally, I'm a big fan of leaving. When shooting, or barbed wires are imminent, just pack your family, some essentials and go have a long boring life somewhere else.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Again - not an option for the majority of people. Not only does that require significant amounts of money, it also assumes the place you're going is accessible (eg open borders, etc) You're advocating from a position of privilege and/or ignorance of you think "just leave" is a reasonable suggestion.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Being the second time I've seen this i did a little research. So is like trump fulgrim?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Rylanor's situation just seems similar to ours;

  • everyone he cares about is morphed into a parody of themselves or dead
  • The authority that he trusted betrayed him deeply
  • He only survived (Drop Site Massacre) by allying with others of the same cause

Bonus if your name is Luigi:

  • Perfectly executed a premeditated attack on the ones who wrong him