this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
187 points (90.8% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3525 readers
233 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Compared to constantly seeing the "winner takes all" election result maps, I think this type of map is a good reminder that a strong diversity of opinion exists in most states.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 148 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I really like the maps that also indicate population, like this dot density map:

https://media.wired.com/photos/5b59eab77756071a9b78f1ee/master/w_1600%2Cc_limit/Dasymetric-Dot-Density-w.jpg

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right, because land doesn't vote; citizens do.

[–] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago

Let me introduce you to the US Senate.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That split right down the middle is quite satisfying.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In case you aren't American, that line is the Great Plains. It's basically the dividing line between where it historically gets enough rain to farm, and where it's dry enough that farming gives way to ranching.

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting! Which side is which?

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The right side is where people farm and the left is more ranching. Obviously, there's farms everywhere, but out west, it has to be irrigated, which can only be done cost effectively in certain locations.

If you know where to look, you can even make out rivers. The Platte river crosses the great plains to Denver (the big blue area).

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

So cool!! Thanks for sharing 😊

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That line is where the party gets started.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

This is literally the best thing that could happen to our democracy, in my opinion. Unfortunately it requires the 2 major parties to agree to give up some of their influence, so...

I like this, a lot of red states proudly dote that they're all red, but that's just not the case. Blues are usually more urban, and in smaller areas so it looks more red, but really most states are pretty purple.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Washington isn't purple. Washington is two States split in half by the Cascade mountains. It's all blue on the West side, and all red on the East side.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 week ago

I mean, it's all blueberries in tomato soup, if you go granular enough.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As someone on the east side, it hurts. I know Washington state was the only state to go more blue this election, but I'm sure the part that wants to become Super Idaho did their best (worst?) to change that.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

At least people are still pretty friendly over there, and really down to earth. I spent some time in Eastern Washington this spring and had a really good time. I was in a small town and it seemed like a long lost piece of Americana.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Ah you mean White Insurrectionist Matt Shea who wanted to take the racist parts of East Washington and the racist parts of Idaho (which is most of the state) and form a new State?

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

this is a terrible infographic

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah... The shades of reds/blues blend together making it extremely difficult to tell the degrees of mixture...

[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

bisexual america

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I thought Texas was extremely red what?!?!

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Texas is gerrymandered to hell which means their reps and state legislature are very Republican. But it's purple enough people recently frequently hope they can flip a Senate seat there.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Texas is big and tends to go red in the winner-takes-all system, but it also has more blue voters than some states have voters total.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

This makes it look like the US was beaten with a baseball bat and thrown from a moving car ... which makes sense because Americans have been beating themselves silly for years.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This would be greatly improved by using a third color as the direct center, IMO - E.g. Blue->Yellow->Red.

Right now, it's basically impossible to differentiate anyone in the middle 50% or so.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You could adjust the alpha to population density.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

So what you are saying is the whole country is shades of lavender?