411
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 122 points 1 year ago

Good.

One of my good friends was one of the voices on LA Noire years ago and gets zero residuals from it. It's maddening.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago

🤷‍♂️I've made multiple million-dollar titles and haven't gotten more than a paycheck from them. I really don't think VAs should get much if any in the way of residuals. Engineers, artists, and designers should get a huge portion of the profits. Giving VAs even a 1% residual is a slap in the face of the rest of the team who build those games. Not to mention the whole team of LA Noire was laid off later that year.

[-] mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

just give everyone residuals

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Someone else made an interesting point how a lot of people don't get residuals. That residuals don't make sense for some jobs. For a VA in the background of a small indie games, do you think it's okay for them to require residuals for their work? This lawsuit focuses on large AAA studios but it will set a dangerous precedent. There any many actors who have to find loop holes to build smaller movie projects. "We technically paid ourselves then invested it into the movie" sort of thing.

That said giving everyone residuals is better than giving no one residuals.

[-] mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I will just say I think everyone involved in a project should be paid a fraction of the proceeds roughly in proportion to the work and sweat they contribute

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] magikmw@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

x_doubt.jpeg

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 76 points 1 year ago

What people might not catch is that this isn't artists, designers or engineers. It's voice actors only. I'm all for people getting what they deserve but as I see voice actors in the games industry demand profit sharing and more rights, I'm reminded that those who actually make the games don't get that. They have overtime without pay.

[-] Lowbird@beehaw.org 118 points 1 year ago

Voice actors are among "those who actually make the games." Voice acting in particular also is strenuous work that can and does cause physical injury when workers are compelled to work long hours doing rough voices and so on. People end up having to have surgery on their vocal cords.

We don't need to devalue voice actors to value other game industry workers. The only difference is the voice actors organized first, probably because of the injury risk, and when you form a union you have to define a group that you can reach and coordinate. It shouldn't be an us vs them among works.

[-] comicallycluttered@beehaw.org 43 points 1 year ago

Don't forget mocap. A lot of actors are doing mocap for games now, which also potentially results in injury.

This also includes stunt workers (who do the more intensive motion capture work) and stunt coordinators, many of whom are in the Screen Actors Guild already.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

They should then let engineers, artists, and designers in their union.

[-] Snowcano@startrek.website 30 points 1 year ago

There are different unions for different trades. Stop trying to sound so smart, you keep failing.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

There are no unions for those trades in games currently. I'm not trying to sound smart. I am trying to tell you why I think VAs are overreaching here.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, great, trade unions. That never caused any issues for worker's unity. If you can't organise everyone, from tech lead to cleaning staff, in the same industrial union you're playing right into the capitalists' divide and conquer game.

[-] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not so. It makes sense to organise in trade unions. The heads of those unions are on the same side most of the time, as it would be in this case, and they can easily coordinate their actions. But in some cases the interests of one trade have no bearing on another, or are even in opposition, in which case it would be somewhere between difficult and impossible to organise a balloted action across the entire union. Thus nullifying the strength of the union and playing right into the capitalist's hands.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hypelightfly@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago

They need to unionize too. Also count actors are included in the "actually make the games" group. Everyone should be paid well, don't drag a group trying to fix that down because the rest aren't doing anything.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

My bad I didn't mean to imply they don't work on the game.

[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Voice actors have a union.

Designers and engineers generally don't. Yet.

[-] fracture@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

for those in america, CWA, Communication Workers of America, is a union that's trying to reach out to the developers in the game industry

[-] Crankpork@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago

A better deal for one group helps the rest of them by setting precedent.

[-] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Or ensures the others get locked out, as the business feels the financial sting of the first effort

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

I’m reminded that those who actually make the games don’t get that. They have overtime without pay.

Yes, capitalism fucks everyone every day unless you fight for what you deserve, usually for decades, and even then only getting half of it. It's surprising that keeping this in mind requires reminders.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Well maybe every one should be getting a Lil slice? Ehh

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago

Correct me if I'm wrong, but since this strike is against certain companies and not some entity that represents the entire industry like it does for movies and television, that means that other individual companies who come to an agreement can still hire these people, right? If so...imagine if we had that in movies and television.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 51 points 1 year ago

We do. A24, for instance, is still making a couple movies by agreeing to work under the proposed terms by SAG. As far as I know, no one else has made such agreements yet. The more of such exceptions that get made, the weaker the AMPTP's position will get.

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dropout.tv (formerly CollegeHumour) is also an unstruck company.

[-] Discola@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

One more reason to love dropout!

[-] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Because they have a different contract for work not covered by the current strike? That seems kind of a weird take, especially since they thought the strike did apply to them originally and they shut down for several weeks until the lawyers got together and said, oh no, you have a different type of agreement.

It's not like they changed or updated their contract to become exempt. SAG just went, oh, your business doesn't fall into the terms of the strike so you don't have to strike with the rest of us.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago

I didn't know that! I just subbed to their service for Make Some Noise so I kind of feel better about shelling out for it now.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Oh, I see. I thought all of Hollywood was AMPTP and that's why we can't have nice things like DRM-free movie purchases.

[-] gaael@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago

I never wondered about the conditions of videogames workers, but I'm really happy that they get better thanks to this movement !

[-] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago

It's 10x worse than whatever you're imagining.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bipta@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

No guarantee anything gets better yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Either everyone needs to get royalties or nobody does.

Pay your voice actors right the first time instead of paying them shit per line. Or if your video game becomes an astounding success, all 1,000 people get a slice of that 100,000,000 million it made in sales via residuals. A cool $100,000 for everyone!

Don't forget to advocate for yourself even if you have a union. Nobody ever gets paid more by saying nothing.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

Either everyone needs to get royalties or nobody does.

Absolutely agree. Otherwise giving someone royalties is a spit on the face of everyone else on the team.

[-] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

The coders have their copyrighted works replicated infinitely without royalties as well.

What makes a voice actor’s contributions more meaningful than that? Especially since they can get a half decent voice performance out of any coder and the right generative software which already exists.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah perpetual royalties are a nonsense slippery slope. People are pushing for it in all the wrong ways wanting a piece of the pie from the higher ups when in reality the way the money flows just needs to be altered.

Bridge and road crews don't get to get a penny every time someone drives over stuff.

Creation does not mean benefit in perpetuity. It means you created something. You should be paid properly for it, yes, but it doesn't mean every time someone mentions your book you get a penny from them lol.

Melancholy Elephants was a great Hugo Award short story about this very thing written in 1983. It's a great read for those who want to go in a bit blind. http://spiderrobinson.com/melancholyelephants.html

How the hell do you spoiler tag on Kbin? lol

[-] not_amm@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

I think that the main problem is that companies keep getting revenue even if actors don't. Book writers don't stop earning money just because they wrote their book 5 years ago, and yes, they don't win money for reselling, but companies like Amazon and their editorials will keep earning money because of their work, so why shouldn't the writers earn money?

If your work isnt being streamed or sold, well, you won't see much. But still, you signed a contract, like the old perpetual pensions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I wonder how many are actually in union to gain that bargain power?

[-] there1snospoon@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 year ago

I know most if not all of the cast of Critical Role (who are voice actors for many video games) are members. Ashley Johnson is the voice of Ellie for TLoU, so if they’re working on TLoU3, they’ll likely have to delay it.

[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I was hoping this extends to many other departments.

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

It doesn't, unfortunately. Programmers, animators, concept artists, designers, each need to unionize in order to leverage collective action grants at the bargaining table. With last week's decision by the NLRB though, it's certain to be easier than ever to get unionized. Still, the amount of coordination it gets to even petition the NLRB to have your union recognized is no small feat. Just now it'll be that much more difficult to bust a union election

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
411 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30431 readers
157 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS