this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
1189 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59656 readers
2658 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • YouTube is intensifying efforts to combat adblockers, including blocking video playback and warning users of potential account suspension.
  • Increased ads on YouTube have driven many users to adblockers, hurting both YouTube’s ad revenue and content creators reliant on ad-based income.
  • Despite these measures, many users are leaving YouTube or finding workarounds, leading creators to seek alternative revenue streams off-platform.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 370 points 3 months ago (48 children)

Imagine being on the YouTube ad team...that has to be the most depressing team in tech history. Your whole existence revolves around peddling ads before people can watch the ads they want.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 203 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even better, you work for one of the wealthiest corporations in the world with virtually unlimited resources at your disposal, and you still get your asses handed to you by a handful of people with laptops.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If they didn’t have to support the web, and various legacy platforms, the could lock it all down with drm more easily.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 138 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Hence Google's proposal to DRM the web

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 73 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At least you can tell your boss "I'm working on it!", sit on your ass, and every 6 months add one more little UI or formula change which "finally stops adblockers" but is defeated within 3 days.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 34 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yeah I don't believe they really put their hearts in it. If they truly wanted to force you into watching ads, they'd manage. Their team is just not that interested.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Their team is probably using adBlockers more than the rest of us. They understand the depth of the surveillance baked into those ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 255 points 3 months ago (28 children)

The other day I visited youtube without any add-ons and concluded I'd rather do anything else than use youtube under those conditions.

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 156 points 3 months ago (8 children)

legit, if youtube ever beats ublock origin, i'll just stop watching youtube

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 78 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Its an all out assault on half your senses without an adblocker. Literal torture.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago (8 children)

The entire web is like that without an ad blocker these days.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago (7 children)

I've had YouTube Premium since the days when it was called YouTube Red, so like a decade. I've grown used to not seeing any ads from Google and anytime I watch a video not using my account it's torture.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk 176 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Once upon a time Google used few and non-intrusive ads. The ads were soo well-placed and relevant, that they almost seemed like a service to the user, rather than being forced upon you. Some of us even added exceptions for Google ads in our ad blockers, so we would not miss out.

I miss those days.

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 66 points 3 months ago

That was almost a decade ago or even before. I remember adockers recommending white listing search engines or recommending to disable non-instrusive ads to support websites.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are some ads that I'm fine with, but they have to be clearly an ad, and related to the content on the site, not based on my previous interactions, nor using tricks to disguise ads as part of the content.

On documentation pages: sure just have a thing related to CS courses, on pirating and streaming sites advertise VPNs, on horny sites advertise horny stuff, and casinos and sports advertise gambling and sports betting. But DON'T make the ad look like a section in the documentation, like another download button, like another horny video on the site, like another casino game or segment of the sports analysis. If I want to explore the ad I will, stop trying to trick me else I will try to block and avoid you entirely! If I figure out that are you spending more effort trying to trick me the less interested I will be in the product you offer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 129 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (23 children)

I’ll never understand the entitlement of these companies when it comes to ads. You send the content freely to my computer along with BS ads. It’s my computer. I’ll display what I want using programs I want.

If you want me to pay for that content with $ or by watching ads - then put up a hard paywall and stop sending the content for free. You can’t get uppity and complain about ad blockers - it doesn’t make any sense…

The real problem is your content sucks and nobody is willing to pay for it. And that’s your problem - not mine.

Here’s some free apples. There’s a newspaper ad stuffed in there as well. Oh you ate the apples without reading the newspaper? Foul ball! /facepalm

Edit: never mind the fact that many ads have been served that are downright malicious code…

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 55 points 3 months ago

I was paying for Google music until they took it away from me and told me it was Youtube Premium and then raised the price twice.

Not exactly what I'd call a great value proposition.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 121 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Good.

Youtube is a wonderful thing. It's a wealth of knowledge and resources unlike anything this world has ever seen.

And it's ran by one of the worst, most predatory corps on the planet.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 113 points 3 months ago (9 children)

i consider unblockable ads to be direct attack on my psyche, trying to worm in and make me think in a way they want. I will never tolerate them and would rather see anything relying on them burn. My mind is my own and no one else has any business influencing me without my permission.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 97 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Despite all of their machinations my strategy of simply ignoring literally everything they say and continuing doing the same old same old appears to be flummoxing them.

I've literally not done anything and have never experienced any inconvenience. Are we sure they're doing anything at all?

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Same, I think they must be AB testing and I don't get assigned into the shitty group

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 83 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

"Should we moderate our ads and get rid of 2 hour long ads, disinformation, porn,scams and fake products?"

"No, no. Thats to much effort. Lets spend hundreds of millions of dollars trying to force people to watch our 2 hour long ads, disinformation, porn, scams and fake products. Thats clearly the way forward."

This decision process brought to you by Prager U proceeds into 30 minutes about how slavery was good for the black man and he should be grateful for it

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 80 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'd rather not watch YouTube videos at all than videos with ads.

[–] polle@feddit.org 38 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Smarttube stopped working some weeks ago for a day. I tried watching YouTube with ads, the experience was so fucking insane to me. Like multiple, non skipable ads before the video starts + more ads during the video. It just was unwatchable. Its just unusable.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 78 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Good fucking riddance.

The sooner they realize the enshittification isn't working, and is only increasing the amount of people participating in the largest global consumer boycott ever, the sooner they'll actually try to improve the platform, or die resisting.

YouTube has continuously made the experience worse, adding more and more ads to users not using ad blockers, to compensate for those using them. Guess what, genius? People block ads because they suck. Adding more won't stop people from using ad blockers!

And they have the audacity to try selling YouTube Premium for a whopping $14/mo (nowhere near the actual revenue generated from a user watching ads,) then don't even provide any real benefit past ad blocking, after they deliberately killed YouTube Originals because it didn't instantaneously bring in immense profits.

And the content creators I personally know have shown me the amount of money they get from Premium users, and it's sometimes less than the value of an ad-supported user, even though the Premium user generates more revenue than an ad-supported one.

I would pay for YouTube Premium if it was a reasonable rate, and actually came with exclusive content, similar to Nebula, but it doesn't.

Instead, YouTube has continued to make the interface more and more bloated, slow, and inefficient, and increased the incentives for low-quality, mass-produced content, all while not paying creators enough to support themselves on YouTube's own platform.

YouTube can't see itself as being the cause of its own issues, because it's blinded by bad ad-driven fiscal policy that has only been a proven failure.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

YouTube is also aggravating customers who use their official apps by increasing the frequency and length of the ads. In just 4-5 months, I've seen YouTube ad lengths on Roku go from 10-15 seconds to 30 seconds, to a minute.

They're trying to recoup lost ad revenue by pissing off the one demographc most likely to sit in front of the TV the longest.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 58 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Gotta love when the article saying adblock-blocking doesn't work is itself preceded by a notice to disable your adblocker

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 56 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The ads have reached a breaking point.

If I can't block them, I'm just not watching the YouTube. I'll never pay.

It used to be funny to link a relevant YouTube clip, but it's not funny if you have to sit through half a minute of ads just to see something silly.

It's also not really a long time streaming service like TV channels or netflix etc., because the homemade content sucks in comparison to an actual documentary that I can also watch without ads on other services.

It's like Google completely misunderstood the point of the service they initially made. Also following a decade of users attempting to "monitize" their fucking crap, you can be sure that there's nothing worth watching on YouTube that couldn't have been better presented in a gif or in text.

Then the player is also fucking up lately. Usually if I go there, I'll check the written description while the ads play, just to see if the content is worth the wait, but nooo.... you can't even do that anymore, because the app will start reloading between the multiple ads and the screen scrolls around and minimizes the description and comments. They're literally hiding any information on the clip except the title until you've watched the ads.

It's fucking garbage. Enshittified to death.

Repeating: Google, if you're listening: I'll never pay for YouTube, no matter how intrusive you make the ads. Enshittification is not encouraging me to pay.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SuperSpaceFan@lemm.ee 55 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who could have foreseen this? s/

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 64 points 3 months ago (4 children)

This battle was lost before it started. Sad thing is, if they weren't so goddamn obnoxious with the ads it wouldn't even need to be a battle. As it stands, YouTube without ad blocker is damn near unwatchable.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The guy who decided to start the battle increased ad revenue for a week so he got his bonus, that's all that matters.
"I'll glady tank YouTube's revenue tomorrow for an extra dollar today."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 3 months ago

I'll stop using YouTube altogether before I disable my ad blocker. My time is simply more valuable than whatever video I'm watching.

[–] copd@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Wheres the data to back up this claim? That article is purely opinion

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] _sideffect@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

Fuck em, they're just greedy fucks that'll blame us for everything.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 42 points 3 months ago (5 children)

If they kept the ads to 10-15 seconds at the start of a video and didn't interrupt my videos for them, I would never use an adblock on Youtube (i'll even give them an allowance for one 10 second ad interruption for every hour in the case of super long videos). But for as long as they keep trying to squeeze every goddamn penny out of me that they can, I will fight back and do everything in my power to prevent them from being allowed even a single ad impression off me.

I'm not unreasonable, but I refuse to accept unreasonable offers.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] azl@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 3 months ago (7 children)

I pay for Nebula and try to watch as much as I can there. The content is more "pleasant department store" and less "Mexican public market".

I do watch YouTube regularly when channel-surfing, but if I ever see an ad (which happens only on mobile devices), I close it immediately and do something else. It's not that I don't think I should be able to watch everything for $0, but YouTube ads are so jarring, random, irrelevant and just make me sick. They literally ruin whatever I was watching and make me sad to exist.

It can be exhausting to wade through the absolute meat market of click bait titles and thumbnails to find something that not only looks interesting but won't abuse me with infomercial-form audio/visuals.

YouTube enables and promotes the "content creators" who abuse human psychology to accumulate views, likes, subscriptions, etc. The best thing that could happen is they continue to be exposed as the drug dealer they are.

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 32 points 3 months ago (12 children)

It’s always laughable to me that these companies are able to have the meta data on our entire lives and yet show ads for shit we don’t even want.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 40 points 3 months ago (1 children)

potential account suspension.

What account?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 40 points 3 months ago (11 children)

I've been downloading my subscriptions and loading them into Plex. Plenty of room for improvement in that system, but I get a nostalgic hit of YouTube long ago. Man, it's fallen so far over the years.

Also related, I've hit 2.4TB of internet use for the first time last month doubling my previous record.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Static_Rocket@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

I want the statistic on how many Google employees use ad blockers now. It's basically a necessity.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Ads suck, but the type of ad is what is sucking the most. All I'm getting are ads for get rich quick schemes. You never see big name brands advertise on youtube anymore.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 38 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I'm starting to think our entire economy is built upon ads.

Edit: Word missing

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I was looking at the comment section from the article and the following comment made me laugh loudly, thinking on how bizarre our current world is:

So a platform that is blocking adblockers is delivering an ad piece advertising an adblocker. Ha! That's an ad I'd love to watch 😂

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Ads overall take up a good amount of time now. I would rather not use Youtube at all if I have to watch long ads.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eugenia@lemmy.ml 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The ads have become too long. Some of them are 40 seconds long, for a 3 minute video. That's unacceptable. I have thought about it, and I think the best would have been a single 8 second ad, unskippable. But never more than that. That, I could take. But multiple ads (even if they're just 5 secs each but you have to be vigilant to press "skip"), or long ads, or interrupting ads, are just too much to accept.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›