this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
123 points (93.0% liked)

Games

32654 readers
1386 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

$50 for the base game, $70 with DLC included.

Steam link provided. Also available on Epic.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thank fucking Christ it's not epic exclusive.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Epic isn't making money on exclusives. Square Enix isn't making money on exclusives. Sony probably isn't even making money on third party exclusives. Thankfully, market forces have ensured that it was never going to be exclusive.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Epic never expected to make money on exclusives. They were using them as a loss-leader to force people to use their shitty store. Fortunately it looks like they've lost enough money to make them stop or at least cut back on their shenanigans.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

The loss leader strategy hasn't worked, is what I meant. They said in an article in the past few days, quite explicitly, that that strategy isn't even working for whatever ill-advised loss leader strategy they're up to in order to acquire users.

[–] Cap@kbin.melroy.org 22 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I've never played these games but after 16 I'm starting to think they are gaslighting us with the word "Final".

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

16 is also close to the 50th game that they've released, according to Google.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

There's a popular urban legend that Square was on the verge of going under and expected the game to be their last, hence the title, but in reality what happened was that the creator wanted the game to initialize as FF and his first choice, Fighting Fantasy, was already taken. He was planning on retiring after the game was published, though, so he eventually settled on Final Fantasy. Still didn't work out, though, because he directed 1-5 and then contributed to 6-10.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

Penultimate Fantasy

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Probably on sale for half off by the holidays. I can wait.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Final Fantasy don’t often go on sale. Though I hope you’re right!

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I'll tell you when the game has been spoiled for me. Because the release date will be announced within days after.

[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 6 points 3 months ago (4 children)

So to people that have played it, how is it? Like compared to previous FF?

[–] Ostrakon@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Oh boy is that a loaded question.

As someone who has played every game in the series, the trend has been to make them less like RPGs and more like action games. Gameplay wise, this was far and away the best action-y one and had a decent enough story. Anything compared to 15 would have looked like a masterpiece, lol.

I vastly prefer the more traditional RPGs overall though. 16 was a pleasant surprise since I came in with a bit of a bias against the shift towards action games, and really only gave it a shot because the director has earned a lot of credit with his handling of 14 (the MMO)

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

FWIW, this is pretty close to how I feel about it. Compared to XV, this game is a masterpiece.

I'd add that the ability recharges make the later combat feel a little bit more ATB-like (to me at least), when you're relying more on those abilities than standard attacks.

Also, I personally think it's the most (or second most) well-told game of the franchise. They do a phenomenal job of setting up different situations with maximum impact. The sad and hopeless feels sad and hopeless, the enraging feels enraging, and the grandiose feels ABSOLUTELY GRANDIOSE.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So there's no MP and all spells have a recharge mechanism instead? That seems like a great way to encourage players to use them more often.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yep, I'll use big powerful abilities on small mobs just to clear the area since it will eventually recharge. Especially once I have a couple big heavy-hitting abilities in my tool belt.

[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 1 points 3 months ago
[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 months ago

You can pet the dog.

[–] mrbean343@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Very different from previous FF's. You only control one character. Combat is very fun, and you can definitely style on your foes with sick combos. Sometimes basic enemies die too quickly. I enjoyed the story for the most part. I love the characters and the world building is great. The side quests are unfortunately one of the weaker points, which is sad because they make up a ton of the content. Great music and visuals. Weapon upgrade system is pretty basic (number go up). Overall a great game IMO, but I don't think it holds a candle to FF7 REBIRTH.

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do you normally control more than one character then? I've only ever controlled one character in the ff I've played so that sounds weird.

[–] mrbean343@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which FF have you played? I was talking about in combat. Most FF yes, you control one character while running around but in combat you fight with a team of three or four. For non-mmo's, only controlling one character during a fight is a first as far as I'm aware.

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

14, so yeah I guess that's more of an exception. I did play a tiny bit of 13 but hated the combat

[–] mrbean343@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Didn't play 13, but watched a friend play a bit and knew it wasn't for me. 13 has great music though.

[–] do_not_pm_me@thelemmy.club 6 points 3 months ago

I loved it. Great story which kept me hooked all the way through. Def recommend.

[–] erin@lemmy.sidh.bzh 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

don't works great on GNU/Linux yet even with a 3080 (very unstable framerate even with low settings). Hope proton will be fixed soon by Valve so this game run like FF7 remake.

EDIT: it's a little better with latest proton GE but still not enough framerate for an DMC-like)

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] delcake@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

No issues on my playthrough of it this morning. It will complain about your GPU driver on launch, but then proceed to launch anyways after you acknowledge the message.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yoshi P and Soken, I'm sold.