this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
367 points (93.8% liked)

memes

10476 readers
3780 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TacticsConsort@yiffit.net 107 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Listen. I do not want fucking ads in the start menu. I have no idea how to code and I can't use the command terminal to save my life but I swear to god I'm going to switch to Linux before I touch Windows 11 with a 10-foot pole

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 34 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Windows Pro doesn't have these issues, only Home. Home doesn't have group policy, so lots of this can't be managed easily. Pro has GP, which is where all this stuff gets controlled by Enterprise organizations.

Even better, LTSC has even less nonsense and only gets security updates (no feature updates, so nothing odd happening).

Get Win10 LTSC. It gets updates 2x/year, has very minimal bloat.

Then get O&O Shutup to reduce bloat even more.

And you can permanently license it using Microsoft's own scripts.

Scripts on Gituub.

This all applies to Win11 too, if you just have to use it.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 5 months ago

Come on, man. Let them come to us. Linux needs more adoption.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Can you get security updates more often than 2x a year doing this method?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Many people suggest popOS for a new linux user which is based on ubuntu which in turn is based on debian. I never tried popOS but i found ubuntu hard to get packages or find help with when i was first learning.

I would recomend endeavourOS which is based on arch. In arch, its very easy to get packages and and find help since you can use the aur and the arch wiki . But it might require using the terminal a bit more than PopOS. Dont let that intimidate you however, the terminal is actually not hard to learn and many tools guide you through using it.

Both are better than windows and i would recomend you try them both on your machine. Just download the live image ISOs to a usb that has ventoy installed. Throw some other distros on there too like nobara just to round out your testing.

Then you can always install it on an old computer (even one that windows dosent work well on) or a spare hdd/ssd while testing until you are ready to leave windows for good.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

I use EndeavourOS, only because I wanted to get up and running quickly. It's still Arch under the hood, and all the fun nuances that come with Arch. I would probably suggest that EndeavourOS is more intermediate, probably popOS or Mint are more beginner-suited.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Stop recommending arch and arch based distros to newbies. They break way too often for people who have never used Linux before.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You don’t need to code or use a terminal to use Linux

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As someone who has fully transitioned to Linux myself recently:

You don't need to know how to code. But I don't know how you think you don't need to use terminal. Linux is complex. You run into problems. You will need to learn to troubleshoot. You will inevitably have to use terminal at some point (even if that's for copy/pasting commands, but you'll still need a very basic understanding).

Trying to underplay the complexity or learning curve for Linux is disingenuous and problematic for new users.

[–] SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

Certainly true for a lot of use cases, but not all. Many folks, like my father, only need access to a web browser anymore. Got him in Linux Mint well over a year ago, and neither he nor I have had to touch the terminal.

For him, Linux is easy, Linux removed the problems Windows caused, troubleshooting has not been needed.

Linux can be all the things you said, but trying to over play the complexity of the learning curve can also be disingenuous and scare away new users.

[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was watching YouTube videos on Fedora recently,and they were stuttering for some reason. A few google searches later, I did find a permanent solution, but it involved using the terminal to install some video or audio codecs.

Watching web videos is a pretty basic thing that most users will eventually do, so needing to install new codecs is kind of a big deal. I think many users would just accept it as a reality of the OS and switch back to Windows rather than looking up forums to find out which packages to install. Linux is full of little fixes like this in my experience. It’s not rocket science, but it’s far from a hassle free experience.

This is not to say that I’m not impressed with how good of an OS you can get completely free, but it’s a reality of using Linux that people should be aware of.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unless if you use Arch btw

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Didn't Windows 10 also have ads in the start menu from pretty much the start, like Candy Crush and such? Or maybe I just used a bloated OS image, wouldn't be beyond me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] variants@possumpat.io 4 points 5 months ago

Good thing you don't need to know to code or use a terminal to use linux. Just install popOS! And you're good to go

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago

It's easier than it looks, figure out how to do the first step: create your live boot flashdrive that you would use to install linux to your hdd. Then boot into that and play around before you install. I reccomend to follow along with this nerd in your terminal like it's a class. Once you learn this basic stuff you're pretty much set.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 71 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Windows 10 won't take screenshots of everything I do on my computer, sooooooooooo

[–] teft@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

Oh its worse than just screenshots. They’re screenshotting, then they ocr the screenshot and store any text in a highly compressed searchable database.

[–] variants@possumpat.io 10 points 5 months ago

But it does scan everything you put on your computer and sends it to microsoft

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] joojmachine@lemmy.ml 50 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Neither.

laughs in penguin

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] buttfarts@lemy.lol 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 months ago

Username checks out

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

Butcher from The Boys shooting lasers

I USE ARCH BTW

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Windows 10 is usable, so linux, I choose linux.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Anyone who thinks Windows 10 is better: Have you tried installing the current version recently? There's like a dozen screens full of bullshit where you have to click "maybe later" or "yes, I want the limited experience", while Windows hits you with messages such as "setting up some stuff" or "relax and let us take care of everything".
Then after installation you have to go through all the settings and deny, deny, deny some more.
Hide the annoying mouseover "news", the search field, remove Edge from desktop, taskbar, standard app settings and favorites, ...Shit, forgot to install updates first.
So you update. Now the privacy settings are changed again, Edge is back everywhere (it's your standard browser again), "news" are back, the search field is back. But only after you clicked through the blue screen asking you all the questions from the installation again.
Not to mention the urgent security notifications telling you you'll lose all your data if you don't set up OneDrive and your PC isn't safe without an MS account...

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

I think windows 10 is better than windows 11, absolutely.

Have I tried installing the most recent version recently? Fuck no. I hate windows. Last time I installed it, it was for work and it was a server OS. That doesn’t change the reality of differences between 10 and 11.

However, your complaints apply to Win 10 and 11 equally.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Are you saying windows 11 somehow isn't a similar horror show with even more privacy invasion?

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I have actually reinstalled recently. I've never had updates re-add or re-enable anything I've uninstalled or disabled. And the setup guide (all the things you deny, deny, deny) hasn't changed much in the last few iterations of Windows. It can also be totally automated to disable or not install pretty much any of those features when you create the installation media, and then you don't even have to manually do anything during setup.

The last thing that just appeared after an update was Copilot. And that was a super simple setting to get rid of.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Anyone who thinks Windows 10 is better

The fundamental difference between 10 and 11 is that in 10 I still remember how to turn off all these features while in 11 its that much more difficult to do so.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Ah, yes. Windows 11 is better because since 11 came out MS made 10 worse.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

11 isnt even a decent sidegrade, its just a controlgrab trying to take away what little self definition a user has.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hey! HEY! I resent that remark - yeah, sure, maybe it is exactly that, BUT it is also at least in equal parts an attempt to shove ads down the throats of customers who are rendered helpless to resist by the factor you mentioned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Windows 10 is as bad as windows 11. The problems with windows run so deep in the Microsoft design philosophy that they infect everything Microsoft touches.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 5 months ago

I'd say 10 doesn't literally take screenshots of your actions every second but would anyone be surprised if it did?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It took me years to get my win10 install to a point that I was somewhat happy with it. I've lost track of how many registry edits i've had to do just to disable a feature I didn't want, or enable a feature microsoft wanted to take away from me. The numerous utilities I've had to download just to have functionality that was built into windows back in 7 or xp. I literally don't remember all the things I've had to do, and I refuse to do it again. Now microsoft wants to take away the entire operating system? No.

I just installed linux yesterday. It is a royal pain in my ass, as several design choices are just different from what I'm used to (middle click is paste? what the hell?). However, there's no ads in the start menu. Text I type into the start menu doesn't get sent to an online search engine. There's no proto-ai garbage. Oh, and it didn't cost $200 like my win10 key did.

It's going to take me a week to set up, as I have tons of data on many ntfs drives that I need to be able to do anything productive, and they're all "read only" because I think windows knows I have a linux install and now blue-screens every time I try to shut it down. (This is a problem because ntfs drives get set to read only if windows doesn't shut down cleanly).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 months ago

Starting to think 8.1 might be the most viable windows version...

I actually really liked it when I used it. It was kind of the windows 7 to eights vista.

Happily on Linux now, tho.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Funny thing is, I have so much stuff in OneDrive now, it has made transitioning from my PC to another temporary/permanent environment much easier. So…they might actually be helping me move to Linux.

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

My gaming PC is sticking with 10 for the foreseeable future, it's my only windows machine and that's because it's a beatsaber and fusion360 machine and I don't want to be bothered with fixing something when I want to get a workout session in or need to urgently design a part.

P.S. if anyone knows how to get fusion working in wine I'm all ears

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lotarion@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I'll take my Arch, please and thank you

[–] dinozaur@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

waiting for Windows 11 LTSC, which should be later this year(?)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›