this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
1402 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

63010 readers
3408 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Their examples are business issues where they want a tech solution.

These are working on a foundation that the internet today, with all it's venture capital money, "free" websites and services that run at a loss is how the internet should look. So they are building technical solutions to force some "trust" facilitate this internet. If a business or website cannot function or be profitable without this, that company does not deserve to survive. It's putting businesses ahead of users.

It works off the assumption that websites should know who the person visiting their website is (or that it's even a human.)

IMO, we need to return to the assumption that users are anonymous and remind people that you don't know who is on the other side so we should not trust at all.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jantin@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Back when Threads got released someone told me on Lemmy that Meta will not pull an EEE on ActivotyPub because something something antitrust Microsoft long ago millions of dollars.

How is Manifestv3 different?

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Curse googles sudden but constant betrayal!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Oka@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's NOT the engineers. It's the executives and corporate management that decides that. The engineers just get paid to implement it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shotgun_crab@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

What a cursed timeline this is

[–] itsmaxyd@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Ad pushing is only part of the problem… These tokens will kill the #InternetArchive Wayback machine. It’s anti-library tech.

Anti-bot tech is inherently anti-human.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Techmaster@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (13 children)

It's almost like Google wants me to trade my android phone in on an iphone.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] PlanetOfOrd@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

News headline, October 2078

Google finds users are covering their ears and closing their eyes; releases nanobots to force eyes open and lock hands behind back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I really need to ween myself off the Internet so that, once it becomes an unusable hellhole in the next 20 years or so, I'll be able to give it up entirely and move on to better things.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Semenaisse@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I’ve tried internet without adblock and it’s almost unusable.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Alperto@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Related: https://lemmy.world/post/2235459

So, we will be forced to see ads, while they can’t yet control who’s publishing those ads. I wonder why Google (and any other ad company) hasn’t been sued yet for showing and infecting malware into the people who click on their ads. Maybe is not that critical or easy for a domestic user, but corporations or governments?

And it’s not because it’s impossible to verify malware before accepting their ads, it’s because THEY DONT CARE. If they can detect music on videos for copyright claims, they can analyze everything, they can also verify publishers. And if they can’t with an algorithm, they should use humans to manually verify publishers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

imagine working on shit like this. like wouldn't that make your life worse as well? how fucking malignant

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Forced to implement is the wrong term - they were tasked with designing it. They can't just swap one person out for another - losing the lead dev or designer would be delay or kill the effort

They could've pushed back - software ethics is a required course for very good reason - but it's easy to never ask if you should do something and skip straight to how. It gets easier to skip that piece every time, and the company isn't going to respect it - we need outside pressure so they can point to us and say "this will have repercussions"

They don't deserve death threats, but trashing everything they push on GitHub is fair. Measured steady pressure - save the most extreme stuff for upper management and shareholders

For the engineers you have to make them understand they did bad and they should feel bad, they need to feel that their peers have lost respect for them, not that this is the public lashing out

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] willy096@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Sometimes it is unbelievable. They want to make the Internet their own, following their model... luckily there will always be people fighting to keep the Internet free, where anyone can decide, in this case, whether to swallow ads or not

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They can't stop dns filters :)

[–] Virulent@reddthat.com 13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Yes they can. DNS blocking doesn't stop YouTube ads, for example. They could also force chrome to use their own DNS servers and use attestation to make sure you're not bypassing that somehow

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Imagine if ads had remained a single static banner at the top/bottom of the page and was hosted by the site itself. Maybe there wouldn't be an arms race to infiltrate every aspect of our digital lives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

Basically adware.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›