The last Pokemon game I played was Y. It was largely the same game as Blue and Gold. This expands on the concept in fun, crazy ways, and it's got me intrigued.
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)
Gaming
3 readers
1 users here now
founded 2 years ago
The last Pokemon game I played was Y. It was largely the same game as Blue and Gold
Except they removed all traces of dungeons/caves (they are simple hallways with no exploration) and puzzles
To be fair, those were so simple that they were barely a challenge when I was 9 years old. When I played Y as an adult, they probably wouldn't have even felt like puzzles.
Go play Arceus
@caseyweederman agreed, Arceus was a breath of fresh air in an incredibly stale series. It’s worth playing.
No thanks.
This isn't pokemon...
I mean, it isn't but also it is, in the same way Lies of P isn't Bloodborne.
The creature designs are similar to Pokémon but that's where it begins and ends. Palworld is a survival sandbox with creature collecting, it doesn't even have turn-based battles. It's far more similar to Ark or Rust than Pokémon.
If anyone wanted a game that "is but isn't Pokémon" they should look into TemTem or Cassette Beasts.
Different degrees of shaking up the formula. This is Pokemon-but-survival, and I've got another game in my backlog already that's Pokemon-but-metroidvania.
Yeah, but I would say that already makes it more markedly different, even compared to, say, Monster Hunter Stories. Sure, there's cutesy creatures which gives it some similar aesthetics but the gameplay experience is not even remotely similar.
Compared to Lies of P which looks and plays like Bloodborne, it's not really that close.
Heh, maybe I'm splitting hairs, but if you want a game "like Pokemon", they've been making exactly that game for 30 years, but there's only a handful of games in the ballpark of Bloodborne. If you want the fantasy of roaming a world, catching creatures, and battling with them, there are lots of ways to skin that cat that GameFreak and Nintendo haven't been doing that aren't at odds with preserving those core pieces. Likewise, I don't enjoy Monster Hunter, but some of its core pieces are present in the likes of Horizon and Mercenary Kings, and I love those games for taking the high level parts of Monster Hunter that do work for me.
I get it, but part of my point is that there are games that are very much like Pokémon for someone who wants 90% of that with a little bit of a different twist. Meanwhile I'm seeing some people looking into Palworld and going "Wait is this Minecraft? I wanted Pokémon with guns."
I haven't purchased (yet) but that's exactly why it caught my attention and it seems to be the way they wanted to be seen.
Playing it now. It's not bad. It's not great. The flying is the laziest implementation I've ever seen.
Peak of 370k concurrent players on Steam already, topping Starfield's peak.
Did this come out of nowhere or did I just miss the signs?
Doesn't come out of nowhere to my knowledge. It is quite anticipated game by many, as it was shown with trailers before on big shows. Everyone was wondering what kind of game this will be and everyone just knew it as "Pokemon with guns" where you can catch and slave other Pokemon like creatures. I'm actually surprised that so many didn't heard of the game before.
And that was just the warm up.
850k concurrent players and rising right now...
It practically came out of nowhere.