this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
796 points (99.0% liked)

Comic Strips

16125 readers
2410 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The lever is powered by AI

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because for the pacing of the scene, "wrapped with ropes" is movie shorthand for "immobilized." Most of the time, most of the audience doesn't really care about the details of the knots.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's also because tying someone up that way is wildly impractical. The fact that nobody wants to show it the proper way is evidence of that.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A bit more practical would be looping the rope under the track itself between the ties; especially if you found a viaduct or something where there is no ballast you could just loop the rope right under.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt every track is easy to find spots to do that. Snidely Whiplash would have to go out and survey all the tracks to find ideal spots, or dig holes ahead of time. That's a lot of trouble when he could just shoot them instead!

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Snidely Whiplash only needs to find a bridge, preferably one over a large ravine.

Then he just has to tie the hostage to the center of the bridge. Then when the hero makes a daring rescue Snidely can blow up the bridge.

And, like I said, the bridge won't have ballast so you don't have to dig out around the rails to tie Pettycoat McVictim town in the first place.