this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
701 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

69109 readers
3133 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Auzy@aussie.zone 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And yet, as per normal, Apple is innocent.. apparently

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Wait, Apple has an illegal advertising monopoly too...?

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Apple doesn’t really have an advertising business. You can criticize them for many things, but it’s hard to fault them for a market they don’t operate in.

[–] Auzy@aussie.zone 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They DO though. They sell the default search engine to Google for billions knowing they're profiting from the ads indirectly.. So, they're really just subcontracting it..

I was implying the fact that Apple doesn't need to though, because they monopolise things via the app store, and with other foul play (like requiring additional intervention if you want to run an app from outside the store on Mac). They have full control over monitoring what apps and what kind of apps are popular, so they can target them with their own competitors.

They also have some fairly hefty requirements from developers, and even try to get a cut of subscription fees despite doing nothing.

In the case of Pebble as an example, they delayed the pebble app, launched their own watch at the same time, and because they fucked Pebble over, they never stood a chance.

Just to further things, Republicans have a clear bias. When the head of google was in congress, they weren't really asking questions, but they were incorrectly stating things like Google was tracking their phone anywhere it moves

And yet, Apple seems to dodge every single case. They don't even allow IOS to run on other platforms. Whereas, there are Android phones which are completely degooglified.

[–] sinceasdf@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

the article is talking about how they could have a booming ad business but at present have little to none

The Cupertino tech giant is not an advertising company, however. Chatterjee notes that Apple's decision to only show a single Search Ad in its App Store could limit the revenue opportunity relative to his prior expectations.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Well, that’s what I mean by “not really”, as opposed to “not at all”. It’s a single as placement - searching in the App Store. One result. No user data. That’s it.

They used to have a real advertising business but shut it down some years ago, it was called iAd.

[–] sinceasdf@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Fair enough, and even if they did I think op in this comment chain was talking about monopoly level advertising so I guess my comment wasn't really warranted either way.

I'm surprised to read they don't at least hoard user data. Very un-big-tech-like of them.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Well, now they have and they want to ramp it up.