this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
161 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

64934 readers
4366 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
161
Google Chrome is killing more extensions than you think - is your old favorite on the list? (www.zdnet.com)
submitted 8 hours ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (4 children)

So, the elephant in the room is Chrome killing ad-blocking.

I think that Firefox (and Firefox forks, like Zen Browser) have low-enough marketshare that websites that depend on ad revenue may just kill support for Firefox if Firefox does permit ad blocking.

https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share

As of February:

Chrome: 66.3%

Safari: 17.99%

Edge: 5.33%

Firefox: 2.62%

The software used to view the Web in 2025 is really mostly under the control of either Google or Apple.

[–] riot@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

I think that Firefox (and Firefox forks, like Zen Browser) have low-enough marketshare that websites that depend on ad revenue may just kill support for Firefox if Firefox does permit ad blocking

An argument could also be made that Firefox and its forks have low-enough marketshare that websites that depend on ad revenue won't want to deal with the extra work of keeping those users out.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of Firefox users spoof the useragent.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

I don't bother. Most sites I wouldn't miss at all. There's only half a dozen or so websites that could force me to take any action on my end.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

There’s always PiHole to block ads at the network level. It takes some setup and a raspberry pi but it can be one of the cheaper ones. And I’m pretty sure the sites aren’t going to do much more than check the User Agent to get the browser so User Agent Switcher will get around 99% of that.

You could, I suppose, block Firefox in other ways (like maybe checking for some random Chromium feature not yet supported in Firefox) but Firefox isn’t usually far behind Chrome so it would almost take an entire new developer to be effective. And there’s probably ways around that too. (I’m a web developer but have never worked on an ad-supported project and never will so I’m not sure but life finds a way.)

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Is it possible to set up the pihole so certain devices are unfiltered? My partner works in digital marketing and needs to test that her clients' ads are functional.

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Yep, I have my PiHole running on a Pi2 still.

You're underestimating these websites though. I already run into sites that arbitrarily throw up a "Firefox not supported" gate until I switch user agents. That will only get worse.

I'm still very concerned about Firefox's funding majority coming from Google search, especially after the antitrust shutting it down. https://slashdot.org/story/431592

We're headed for dark times for the open internet.