this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
112 points (85.9% liked)

Casual Conversation

2633 readers
314 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I haven't used a clock in years that I need to manually reset. Older people don't seem to realize clocks on phones and other devices reset automatically.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That feeling is nostalgia for a time when Reagan condemned many to die for loving the wrong people, DND was satanism, peter thiel's and musk's parents were busy apartheiding black workers to death.

The feeling will pass.

[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

You know you are not responsible for everything that happens the moment you are born. It is a ridiculous stance honestly.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

You are not, and nobody said you were...but woof, way to tell us where your insecurities lie lol.

However when you say you grew up in the pre internet world and it was a much better place, that is unfortunately called "wrong" and I was correcting you.

[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Me believing times were better then is my opinion. Just my opinion. People went outside, interacted with each other in real life, and formed real relationships. In my opinion those were better times. Now you have the crisis of loneliness, millions who have never even had a friend, and 90% of young people suffer from some phobia, mental illness, or personality defect. Now is a better time in your opinion and that is fine too.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 1 points 5 hours ago

Ah going the it's just an opinion man, route.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yay! Cherry-picking to shit on the past is fun!

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Why do you find apartheid fun?

See I can make a bad faith response just like you.

[–] SharpieThunderflare@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This type of all or nothing rhetoric is bs. It's ok to be nostalgic for a time that was better in some ways while rejecting the ways that it wasn't. The fact is, the rise of the internet has made life a lot more complicated and brought new problems even as some have been solved.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, I agree, saying pre-internet times were somehow absolutely better is indeed bs.

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 1 points 5 hours ago

Yes, thank you for noticing