Asklemmy

45934 readers

1418 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What is still considered a rivalry, even though it's mostly one-sided? (kbin.melroy.org)

submitted 1 day ago by venotic@kbin.melroy.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't have any good examples that I know of, but I am very curious. To me though, a rivalry is a rivalry when two or more of people are closely competitive. But is it really a rivalry anymore when someone has more victories over the other? I don't think so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Mendicant_Bias@feddit.uk 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This doesn't feel like an answer to the question. Sounds like you're saying that Android and iOS are both now similar, not that one has been victorious over the other.

[–] kayazere@feddit.nl 1 points 6 hours ago

I would say it is one sided in that the user gets the same treatment/experience from either platform even though they are consider rivals and each company would argue they are different.