this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
582 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

60331 readers
4598 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 109 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

just grow a pair and ban twitter, spacex, starlink, and tesla from operating in europe already.

there's no good reason to let them operate.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 38 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They’re mostly all national security threats, especially with Elon and Putin having a special relationship.

I mean AfD is also pro-russia AND have neo-nazi's in its ranks.

They are at 20% in polls just before the german election.

I don't think many people have as many issues as they should have with russia or they just don't care.

[–] Defectus@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Tesla is getting a buttload of cash from the EU soon in climate compensation (also Volvo but not so much).

[–] thmnwlf@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

ok so people who already have teslas should be fucked? if they will be forced to stop operation, some service offerings will not be available. nice

a car isnt a political statement for everybody, for some people its a fucking tool

edit: modifying software of cars in general is highly regulated. so banning tesla would create issues for people having those cars, i would love to “homebrew” them but hey, thats fucking illegal

[–] uis@lemm.ee 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

As you said, they are services. They are not required.

edit: modifying software of cars in general is highly regulated. so banning tesla would create issues for people having those cars, i would love to “homebrew” them but hey, thats fucking illegal

How is it even related to services?

[–] thmnwlf@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

repair, checkup and support services maby? all the stuff a car needs in its lifetime? or did i get something wrong?

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 56 minutes ago

Dunno. Sounds like something anti-monopoly body should have banned anyway.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online -3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 12 hours ago

Ukraine and other countries where fixed infrastructure is failing iirc benefit from having low cost Internet access.

[–] twei@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Have you never been to small and poor ^/s^ countries like Germany where this sometimes is the best option for getting internet access? ^/srs^
Edit: Added tone indicators because no one got it

[–] clot27@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Starlink, in some places in Germany is the only usable option. We have shitty infrastructure.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I think it was the statement that Germany is a "small and poor country" that they were whaaaating about.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

They used that as sarcasm to highlight that Germany has no excuse for having shit infrastructure due to their wealth and economy size, unlike other countries.

[–] twei@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 hours ago

Thanks, at least someone got it. We are the third biggest economy on this planet and still have the shittiest internet connection a developed country can possibly have, and all of that is only because one corrupt politician said (as in "was paid to say") that Television is the technology of the future. It's getting better, but holy fuck, how could this happen.

[–] kadotux@sopuli.xyz -1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Mate tf are you on about? Small and poor like Germany?

[–] Haribro@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

In the context of Internet connectivity it might as well be (and I think that's what the joke was about). Fiber build-out is atrocious and large areas are stuck on 16mbps speeds. Coincidentally cell coverage also sucks in these areas so starlink is the only way to get Internet with decent speed.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

That's not "small and poor".

Edit: Oh, it was a German "joke". Now I understand. :)

Although I'm REALLY skeptical that for more than maybe 1% of the population that Starlink is the best option.

[–] twei@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 hours ago

German humor :)

maybe 1% of the population [...]

That would be more than 800k people, although the number of affected people does not make a difference. You don't even think about taking communication away from anyone without there being a replacement for them. And in the scope of Germany, this means that we'll need starlink access for the next decade or so.