this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
1386 points (97.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9873 readers
828 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

there wasn't anywhere else they could have stopped

so there wasn't a road?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The dude wasn't looking up. this was 1000% his fault, jesus christ.

I don't drive. I ride everywhere. And someone going head down teararse completely ignoring everything around them is a fcking idiot. This time it was a car. Coulda been a pedestrian, an animal, even trash, same result. The dude failed basic 101: be aware of your surroundings

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Cool story. Car shouln't have been on the cycle path regardless.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ideally, yeah and I hate cars as much as anyone, but if my car broke down I would probably do the same. If the car broke down then that is the one situation that I cannot blame a driver for parking in the bike lane

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

Again, why not on the road??

[–] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's pretty much a highway. Dangerous to stop on, and the shoulder was turned into a bike lane. Beyond the bike lane on that stretch was a ditch the car couldn't cross without damage.

I'm presuming they were broken down, it's the usual reason for someone to abandon a car kilometres from the city or suburbia. They may have been pulled over by police and not allowed to continue due to drunk driving.

It really was a crap situation where the car had no other safe option and the cyclist would have been okay had he looked forward instead of down.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

the cyclist would have been okay had he looked forward instead of down.

Just like any approaching car. This is just valuing the life and well being of car users more than cyclists.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I agree with you on the caring more about car users part, except that the shitty infrastructure caused that scenario. If there's no where to safely emergency park a car except for the bike lane that's on the town or city and where the anger should be directed.

I'm a timid person and won't ride a bike in my town because of how narrow the shoulders are and there's always gravel, sand and debris on it. It freaks me out too much, which sucks since I'd prefer to do that since it's more affordable.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

If there's no where to safely emergency park a car except for the bike lane that's on the town or city and where the anger should be directed.

Ok, but that's my point, it wasn't safe to park on the bike lane and it never is. Where do the bikes go even if the cyclist sees it beforehand? On the road.

If I have to choose between endangering someone in a metal cage or someone who has only air separating their meat from the road, I will choose the former, always.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Even better is to push for better infrastructure so no one is in danger?

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sure but you won't build better infrastructure in that moment that was talked about in the previous comments.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

I find its better to focus on how that can be prevented from happening to others, and protect future bicyclists because people like me are too fearful to even try with how the roads currenly are....but to each their own.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 6 points 4 days ago

This is just acknowledging that sometimes things suck. I'm not saying the cyclist was at fault, just that he would have been better off if he had looked ahead at least once in the half a kilometre the car was visible for.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I am a huge bicycle advocate. My dream is to live in a car free place, but riding your bike without looking where you are going is both illegal and insane to me. Keep your eyes on the road (in front of you) while driving or riding.

[–] horse@feddit.org 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

safe option

severely injured cyclist

Pick one. Just saying, whatever the situation, it obviously wasn't a safe option.